Other methods have earlier been suggested for the expansion of tunable BBs comprising tunable acoustic gradients [ 35 ], lens imaging [ 36 ], and by means of the electro-optic effect in a uniaxial nonlinear crystal [ 37 ]. By spatial filtering in the focal plane of the primary lens utilized for imaging, aberrations arising from the rounded tips may also be reduced [ 38 ]. The fluidic axicons offer a compact, higher throughput and enhanced beam quality solution relative to these schemes. In this paper, we have reviewed the recent developments related to the methods used for the generation of NDBs by employing diffractive axicons [ 39 40 ], meta-axicons-flat optics [ 41 ], spatial light modulator [ 42 ], and photonic integrated circuits-based axicons [ 43 44 ], as shown in Figure 2 . The range of NDBs produced by a real axicon is determined by the axicons parameters such as diameter and refractive angle [ 45 46 ]. When adjusting measuring ranges, it may be necessary to substitute the axicons with distinct angles or adjust the axicons cone angle [ 47 ]. It is inconvenient to substitute the axicon and modify the optical route and adjusting the cone angle is difficult [ 48 ]. The efficiency of NDBs and their applications would be affected by axicon fabrication errors. As a result, it is intriguing to offer a method for simulating axicons that can vigorously and compliantly modify the axicons parameters devoid of triggering fabricating errors. Our research group at Samara National Research University has been working on diffractive optical axicons for the last 10 years and we have successfully published several pioneering works in this field.
Click here to get more.
An amazingly simple method was employed for the construction of the fluidic axicon [ 33 ]. As a model, a commercially available quartz axicon was used. This axicon was submerged in PDMS and treated. The quartz axicon was then separated, leaving a cone-shaped cavity inside the PDMS block. The block was then positioned between two glass slides, guaranteeing effortless and parallel optical faces. Through the PDMS, narrow inlet and outlet channels were created to permit the filling of the conical cavity with liquid of recognized refractive index [ 33 ]. Even though PDMS is utilized for the inverse molding of the axicon, it is feasible to use any polymer with high imitation fidelity and suitable optical characteristics. With a linearly polarized nm Gaussian beam, the fluidic axicon was illuminated. A charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was used to directly record IR images of the resulting BB. If a fluid with a refractive index higher than PDMS is utilized, a BB is formed instantly after the fluidic axicon. When the refractive index of the fluidic medium filling the void is less than that of PDMS, it is essential to add a telescope to create the BB. In [ 34 ], a liquid immersion axicon is produced that is capable of providing tunable BB, along with reducing the aberrations ensuing from the rounded tip of the axicon.
The BB provides a considerably extended (typically one order of magnitude longer) depth of focus (DOF) than the Gaussian equivalent with a comparable beam diameter (2~2) than the normal GB, which is delivered by a focusing lens, as shown in Figure 1 b [ 12 ]. The elongation of DOF (= 2 × Rayleigh range) in the Gaussian configuration will necessitate lenses with extended focal lengths and incident beams with narrow beam diameters. This traditional design has a wide range of applications and, unwantedly, produces a focused beam with a wide beam diameter, which limits uses for managing small features. In this case, the Bessel arrangement might provide a large DOF while keeping the beam diameter small.
The most intense part of the beam is the central lobe, which does not extend throughout the nondiffractive propagation (Bessel zone). The wavevectors of the BB propagating in a conical pattern can be used to estimate the length of the Bessel region 31 ]:whereis the incident GBs diameter. The energy density in the central lobe of any transverse plane within the Bessel zone would come from a consequent ring in the initial Gaussian allocation that is refracted by the axicon on this area. The energy (2distributed over the surface area () can be used to approximate the peak fluence of the central lobe () [ 32 ].wheredenotes the Gaussian input energy. The half conical anglecan be used to calculate the peak fluence.
As collimated GBs travel into an axicon with a refractive indexand a base angle, they diverge from the optical axis by an angle of, as shown in Figure 1 a [ 12 ]. The interference pattern generated by the conical crossing of wavefronts travelling through the axicon is known as the zeroth-order BB with the conical half-angle. The beams transverse profile consists of a sharp central core encircled by circular rings. The first zeros of the Bessel function will be used to calculate the maximum width/diameter of the central lobe (2) [ 30 ].
The zero and high-order BB, also known as a nondiffracting beam (hereafter denoted as NDB), has several benefits, including preserving the size and shape of the central spot [ 9 11 ]. NDBs have been utilized in several applications, including laser machining [ 12 ], field depth extension [ 13 ], measuring multi-degree-of-freedom error motions [ 14 ], and 3D shape evaluation [ 15 16 ]. Vortex beams, specifically BBs, have recently attracted a lot of attention due to their unique properties in particle trapping [ 17 19 ], particle handling/rotation [ 20 21 ], and acoustic radiation force strategies in liquids [ 22 ]. BBs, known for their long depth of focus, have been used in material processing [ 23 24 ] and photopolymerization [ 25 26 ]. Their prospects for high-throughput 3D printing, on the other hand, have not been thoroughly examined. The BBs have a range of advantages, but they also have certain disadvantages. To begin, here are some energy characteristics: Due to the high energy cost, diffraction-free properties are achieved. Since only a small portion of the incident energy is concentrated in the central spot, the amount of energy on the optical axis decreases as the axial length of the beam increases. Furthermore, the presence of peripheral rings: as the focal spot shrinks, side lobes expand, worsening the image properties [ 27 ]. A detailed review of the applications of BBs can be found in [ 9 29 ].
Laser beams in general have a Gaussian profile. An ellipsoidal focus formed by a lateral spot size and a confocal length is created when a GB is focused by an optical lens [ 5 ]. The congregating conical wavefront of an unbounded degree creates an ideal BB. The slanted conical wavefront makes the distinguishing BB shape as it assembles with the axis of symmetry and intermingles with itself. BBs are articulated in the far-field as a single ring pattern sprouting from its slender angular spectrum [ 6 ]. While a true BB would take a boundless aggregate of energy to be produced, an axicon delivers a decent estimation with virtually non-diffracting characteristics within the depth of focus () of the axicon [ 7 8 ].
Mcleod was the first to coin the term axicon offers the most effective method for generating zero-order Bessel beams (hereafter represented as BBs), first published in [ 1 ]. There are two configurations of axicons: a positive axicon and a negative axicon. From the perspective of geometric optics, the positive axicon converges the incoming beams, while the negative axicon diverges the beams within a certain transmission distance [ 2 3 ]. For material processing, the created Bessel region is typically imaged onto the specimen to be processed by a lens setup involving two lenses or a lens and microscope objective. However, the Bessel region has a considerably increased peak strength relative to the original Gaussian beam (hereafter represented as GB) is still present immediately behind the axicon tip. High pulse intensities are known to cause plasma production and filamentation in the air, which should be avoided to ensure a safe and manageable ultra-short pulsed laser machining procedure. Negative axicons can be used to solve the generation of BBs with the additional focal length by splitting rather than superimposing the incoming GB [ 4 ]. A GB is transmitted through a negative axicon through a ring-shaped beam (later abbreviated as RSB) profile that can be focused later to create a BB. In comparison to the positive axicons, there is no additional Bessel region behind the optical element.
The use of spatial light modulators (SLMs) provides functions like those provided by DOEs. However, SLMs and DOEs are not interchangeable devices, as each has its advantages and disadvantages. SLMs tend to be supporting the implementation of a multi-level phase profile, while the fabrication of multi-level DOEs is not easy (just binary elements are the easiest to fabricate). The undoubted advantage of using SLMs is the implementation of dynamic control of the generated light fields. The limitations of SLMs are also well known: the relatively low damage threshold and efficiency of commercially available solutions, which somewhat limits the use of SLMs with high power lasers, for example, it requires additional SLM cooling systems [ 139 ]. DOEs makes it possible to obviate the challenges arising from the use of SLMs, namely their relatively low damage threshold and the need to use an additional optimization encoding for the realization of polarization changes [ 140 141 ]. However, SLMs are convenient dynamic devices of diffractive optics that are used in many optical applications.
Axicon-lens doublets realize the Fourier transformation of BBs [ 121 ] are used to generate a light ring with the radius independent on vortex phase singularity (See Figure 7 ), named as the perfect optical vortices (POV) [ 122 123 ]. Such beams are used for optical capture and manipulation of microparticles [ 124 ], for free-space-optical communication [ 125 126 ], for high-resolution plasmonic structured illumination microscopy [ 127 ] in the study of noncollinear interaction of photons having orbital angular momentum (OAM) in the spontaneous parametric down-conversion process [ 128 ], as well as for the generation and detection of optical vortices outside the focal plane [ 129 ]. In the vector case, or when high-aperture optical elements are used (for example, a toroidal lens [ 130 131 ] may be used instead of an axicon-lens doublet), additional effects arise associated with both polarization transformations and redistribution of the 3D structure of the field intensity [ 132 138 ].
Interesting and unusual properties are also provided by combining the two classic elementsthe axicon and the lens. Typically, axicon-lens doublets (or lensacons) are investigated in the scalar paraxial approximation [ 103 105 ] and applied to vary the depth and lateral size of the focal area [ 106 ]. These properties of the lensacons are used in various optical systems [ 47 109 ] including medicine [ 110 112 ] as well as for laser structuring and micromachining [ 113 117 ]. In addition, lens-axicon combinations are used to control the polarization conversion of the beam in an anisotropic crystal [ 118 119 ] or multilayer anisotropic film (See Figure 6 ) [ 120 ].
It is known that the axicon generates the zero-order BB with the central spot size at the half of the intensity maximum (full width at half maximum, FWHM) is 0.36 λ [ 91 92 ], which is 37% smaller than the size of the Airy disk (FWHM = 0.5 λ) formed by a lens with the same NA. This fact makes the axicon promising in applications where it is necessary to form a light spot compact in the transverse direction. However, for the linear polarization of the illuminating radiation, which is produced by most lasers, a decrease in the size of the focal spot in the total intensity of the electromagnetic field is prevented by the powerful contribution of the longitudinal component, which broadens the transverse size of the light spot along the polarization axis. In this regard, many studies have considered a radially polarized incident beam. With radial polarization, the high aperture axicon forms a light spot, consisting mainly of one longitudinal component, and makes it possible to overcome the diffraction limit predicted by the scalar theory in comparison with the lens [ 93 94 ]. Strengthening the longitudinal component is important in applications such as microscopy, high-resolution metrology, electron acceleration, and material processing [ 95 ]. To obtain a similar effect for uniformly polarized radiation (with linear or circular polarization) it has been suggested in the works [ 96 97 ] to use asymmetric diffractive axicons (See Figure 5 ). It is also possible to redistribute the longitudinal component to the central part of the focus due to the introduction of a linear or vortex phase singularity into the structure of the annular grating (or linear axicon) [ 98 ]. Axicons are also successfully used for efficient polarization and phase transformations in anisotropic media [ 99 102 ].
In addition, refractive axicons have the numerical aperture (NA) limited by the angle of total internal reflection [ 73 ]:whereis the refractive index of axicons material. For example, if= 1.5 (glass), then= 0.75. Higher NA values can be achieved using diffractive axicons, which can be used for sharp focusing and polarization conversions.
Refractive conic axicons have not only advantages such as high energy efficiency and low chromatic dispersion, but also disadvantages. Manufacturing of refractive axicons of anticipated quality poses some challenges due to the difficulty of technology and the lack of simple approaches of control and certification of conical surfaces [ 87 90 ].
Note that narrow axicons [ 73 ] with a small opening angle (about 20°, Figure 4 a) are used as tapered fiber probes in scanning near-field optical microscopes (SNOMs) and can detect evanescent radiation [ 69 75 ], and also may be used as sensors of the longitudinal component of the electric field [ 76 77 ]. Lately, some adjustments of the classical conical axicon have been well thought out: gradient index axicons [ 78 79 ], axicons coupled with a spiral phase plate (SPP) [ 80 81 ] as well as logarithmic axicons [ 82 83 ], axicons with non-linear profiles [ 84 85 ] andwrinkled [ 86 ] (See Figure 4 ). Such structures, as a rule, combine several functions: not only the generation of Bessel-like beams, but also the introduction of a vortex phase, the formation of a uniform or spiral intensity, a decrease in the size of a light spot, and an increase in the resolution.
The axicon was originally known in the form of a glass cone (refractive axicon). In classical optics, axicons are used to generate BBs [ 63 ]. Besides, convex or concave conical prisms (axicons) with Brewster angle can be used to generate nonuniform polarizations [ 64 66 ]. Downscaling the size of glass conic axicons to micrometer length scale via the expansion of advanced fabrication techniques significantly expands the application range of microaxicons or tapered fiber probes [ 67 70 ], allowing them to occupy an important place in micro- and nano-optics [ 71 73 ].
Optical setups for generating a RSB are seen in Figure 3 . To rebuild the beam, an axicon is typically used as seen in Figure 3 a [ 62 ]. Figure 3 b shows a diffractive axicon that is more compact. A BB with a longitudinal axial beam is also obtained between the diffractive axicon and a lens in this solution [ 62 ]. Since the lens may be affected by irradiation of the BB in the unlikely event of a high-power laser, the BB is unsuitable for some applications. Designing a negative diffractive axicon, as seen in Figure 3 c, is one way to prevent such harm [ 62 ]. The lens is not damaged in this case; however, the RSBs width is technically double that of the diffraction limit, since the maximum NA of the diffraction light is half that of standard focusing with a lens. For certain applications, the resulting reduction in resolution may be an issue. The setups in Figure 3 a,b have the same problem. A radial grating is used to solve this problem, as shown in Figure 3 d [ 62 ].
Laser beams with ring-shaped intensity allocations have drawn a lot of interest in science and technology for several applications. The utilization of optical elements for instance spiral phase plates [ 56 ] or axicons is popular in these applications for producing RSBs. However, since the functional numerical aperture (NA) of a RSB is smaller than that of a GB, the RSBs produced by these approaches have a non-diffraction-limited resolution. This is attributable to the propagating beams effective numerical aperture being reduced after passing through the element. The usage of a hollow optical fiber [ 57 ], a computer generated hologram (CGH) [ 58 59 ], and a liquid crystal cell [ 60 ] have all been documented as methods for generating RSBs. Recently, an axicon was proposed that would not require the use of an additional lens to perform the Fourier transform [ 61 ]. However, since the functional NA of a RSB is less significant than that of a GB, the RSBs in these applications have non-diffraction-limited precision. To solve the problem, a radial grating-based optical element is proposed to produce a diffraction-limited RSB [ 62 ]. The fine-tuning of the phase distribution in the RSB is an important part of maximizing the diffraction-limited RSB. The debris on a morphological structure manufactured by single-shot irradiation was significantly decreased in an experiment for fs-laser handling with a RSB because the resulting pulse did not disrupt the melt-solidification structure [ 62 ].
When Durnin proposed the idea of NDBs, interest in axicons was reignited [ 52 ]. He showed a subset of optical fields that travel unaffected in free space since they are accurate solutions of the wave equation. The BB has an optical field whose amplitude is related to the zero-order Bessel function of the first kind, and it is an illustration of those fields that meet the axial symmetry criterion [ 52 ]. It has also been demonstrated that a BB can be created by combining a circular aperture and a regular lens, as seen in a typical axicon [ 53 ]. The optical field of an axicon-generated beam is only represented by a Bessel function in the near-axis approximation, making it a quasi-BB. However, because the optical field along the optical axis is important in a wide range of applications, BBs are still useful. Nondiffracting propagation and a micron-sized spot are two attractive properties of the BB. In laser machining, these beams have piqued scientists curiosity as an energy source [ 12 54 ]. Since BBs are nondiffracting, it is easy to demonstrate that they have many benefits over traditional beams when a BB shaped by a conical lens is employed instead of a traditional beam focused by a spherical lens. These benefits include: (1) a large gap between the workpiece and the mirror, which helps prevent ablated material from adhering to the lens, (2) high aspect ratio laser drilling is feasible, and (3) focusing does not necessitate precise alignment. In addition to these benefits, an axicon lens provides for a greater overall allowable misalignment than a standard lens [ 55 ]. Despite their poor energy efficiency (it is known that each ring and central spot of BB contains the same amount of energy [ 54 ], so the energy in the central spot is a small fraction of the entire beam), BBs have been proven to be encouraging for laser machining.
A phase transformation equivalent to the passage of the beam through an axicon is attained by the CGH displayed on the SLM [ 147 ]. The algorithm employed to generate CGH is simple and can be changed in real-time. Though, SLMs, have their downsides. SLMs are pricey and are susceptible to aberrations added in the production process, but it is possible to reduce the effect of these aberrations by introducing corrective terms to the CGH [ 148 ]. Recently, a low-cost SLM for practice in undergraduate and graduate optics labs is presented in [ 148 ]. For effective cone angles greater than several milliradians, due to the finite pixel resolution of the device, the accuracy of the BB may be compromised by aliasing. Furthermore, to displace the BB from the non-diffracted zero-order spot, a blazing function must also be used. As a result, in comparison to a conventional axicon, a large amount of light is lost by the SLM. Usually, liquid crystal-based SLMs impose a strict constraint on the strength of the illuminating beam due to the possible harm incurred by heating, which may be a significant limitation for applications involving high laser powers. Lastly, the limited scale of numerous commercially available SLMs bounds the feasible transmission distance [ 149 150 ].
Using a single reflective SLM, a simple but effective approach for producing zeroth- and first-order GBBs [ 146 ]. Diffraction half-angles of less than 40 μrad are obtained, and the propagation distance of the beam of more than 1.5 m is attained. In Figure 9 , the experimental configuration is shown in the upper panel. To avoid damaging the SLM, the beam from a high-power few-cycle fs laser system is first controllably attenuated by a neutral density filter (NDF). The beam is then passed through a pair of fused silica wedges for accurate modification of the systems minimum pulse duration. The pulses are characterized by spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction using a commercial device. Figure 9 a shows an example of a normal pulse (duration 7.5 fs) [ 146 ]. Following the wedges, the beam enters the first half of the SLM, which has been programmed with the phase distribution of a highly charged optical vortex, as seen in Figure 9 b [ 146 ]. The beams phase and amplitude are modulated, and the beam is diverted to M1, a clear silver mirror. The beam is reflected a second time at the other half of the correctly programmed SLM through this mirror. The topological charge of the highly charged optical vortices formed from the first reflection is reset to zero or one after this second reflection. Figure 9 c depicts a standard RSB in the plane of the lens [ 146 ]. Due to their diffraction resistance, BBs are useful in high aspect-ratio micro-hole drilling. However, traditional BB generation approaches result in low adjustability of the nondiffraction length. The use of a phase-only SLM to generate Bessel-like beams (BLBs) with an arbitrary nondiffraction length is demonstrated [ 116 ]. Nondiffraction lengths ranging from 10 to 35 mm can be obtained using this process by altering the designed phase profile. The drilling results are shown in Figure 9 d [ 116 ]. By spatially forming a fs laser beam, high-quality, high aspect ratio (560:1), and length-adjustable micro-holes can be drilled [ 116 ].
Pulsed ultrashort non-diffracting GaussBessel beams (GBBs) may be beneficial in a range of applications, containing nonlinear optics and materials processing. SLMs can be employed as robust, extremely reconfigurable, vigorously manageable holograms, and their uses in the field of atom optics [ 144 ]. Light patterns that do not need microfabrication and can be projected into a vacuum system away from any surfaces can be created using such devices. A variety of light shapes that are challenging to create with traditional micro-optical procedures, but can be created with engraved holographic approaches, though they lack the versatility of the patterns created with the SLM. Though etched holograms can be used to create certain designs, the SLM has several advantages over these methods. The theories of diffraction, interference, and holography can be proven dynamically with real-time control over the constraints. Furthermore, SLMs make new studies feasible that are not practicable with traditional axicon model. For instance, SLM can also be employed to generate an array of BBs by adding the complex fields corresponding to an array of axicons and then extricating the phase of the resulting complex number as demonstrated in [ 145 ]. An array of 3 × 3 BBs is created and recorded on the CCD camera [ 145 ].
Tunable axicons have been realized using several methods. The axilens, which incorporates the characteristics of an axicon and a spherical lens, was created using CGH optical components [ 103 ]. To obtain lensacons, a method established on a liquid crystal and phase-shifted electrical signals was suggested, with the logarithmic axicon as a model [ 48 ]. Some researchers used CGHs to create an arbitrary-order BB sequence that was nearly diffraction-free [ 58 142 ]. Since the perfect real axicon can produce nondiffracting BBs, fabrication errors can have an impact on the efficiency of NDBs. As a result, an easy-to-use approach is proposed. To attain phase modulation of the incident beam, the process involves loading the CGHs into the SLM. Figure 8 a shows the hologram for mimicking the positive axicon, while Figure 8 b shows the holograms central profile [ 143 ]. The profile can be seen as an arrangement of evenly spaced grooves, where d and h are the period and height of the grooves, respectively.
The chief drawback of subwavelength gratings is the nonuniformity of the Fresnel reflection coefficient that arises because of the nonuniformity of a crystals refractive indices. However, this shortcoming can be evaded by joining subwavelength polarization gratings with a binary focusing element (See Figure 11 ), for example, zone plate or binary axicon [ 197 200 ]. In this case, the focusing element creates an additional phase, which is realized by rotations of the subwavelength grating grooves. A phase incursion of π radians corresponds to a rotation of the grooves by 90 degrees ( Figure 11 ), and then all areas of the optical element will transmit radiation approximately uniformly.
MSs are often used to implement polarization transformations, including the formation of cylindrical vector beams (CVBs) with radial or azimuthal polarization [ 187 188 ]. Among the various types of MSs, the most common are metal and dielectric subwavelength gratings [ 189 190 ], including nanostructured fused-silica q-plates [ 191 192 ] and S-waveplates [ 193 ] as well as structures of subwavelength anisotropic primitives (meta-atoms) [ 194 196 ]. Each type of MSs has its advantages and disadvantages. Metal subwavelength gratings work as a rule in a reflecting mode and are less chemically resistant to an aggressive medium, so all-dielectric MSs are preferable.
One attractive possible application of MSs is the formulation of a meta-axicon based on these properties [ 186 ]. Recently, these properties were used to demonstrate a variable meta-axicon made up of rectangular nano-apertures assembled in numerous concentric rings that can focus left circularly polarized (LCP) light into a real BB and defocus right circularly polarized (RCP) light into a virtual beam [ 41 ]. By regulating the orientations of the nano-apertures, the desired phase discontinuity in cross-polarized transmitted light is added along with the interface. Furthermore, by properly designing the phase profile along the surface, meta-axicons can produce BBs of arbitrary orders. The meta-axicons have broadband optical properties, allowing them to change the wavelength of incident light from 690 nm to nm [ 41 ]. The SEM image of the meta-axicon is shown in Figure 10 a. The intensity profiles along the propagating directions and cross-sections are shown in Figure 10 bh.
The metallic elements, such as Ag and Au, were used in the groundbreaking work on MSs [ 184 185 ]. However, in the visible domain, polarization conversion limitations and internal ohmic losses of noble metals at optical frequencies have hampered the production of robust and cost-effective plasmonic-based MSs. Due to these limitations, researchers looked for suitable VIS-spectrum materials to create highly efficient MSs. Lossless dielectric materials with polarization-insensitive geometrics of their nano-resonators are the best candidate for addressing this problem, as they can ensure high efficiency for transmission-based geometries in the VIS-spectrum. Various research groups have shown exceptionally effective MSs using lossless dielectrics, such as TiO, GaN, Si, and others [ 179 ].
Most of these surfaces are made up of a collection of subwavelength MA arrays with precisely formed shapes and orientations [ 162 ]. As light propagates through an interface between two media, phase discontinuities are introduced. The PancharatnamBerry phase, also known as the geometric phase, is a common method for performing phase modulation using MAs with space-variant optical axis orientations [ 173 174 ]. Axicons integrated into optical fiber [ 175 ], cascading lenses [ 176 ], and metallic subwavelength MSs [ 177 ] have all been used to create BBs. Ultrathin subwavelength MSs have gathered a lot of coverage because of their outstanding benefits. MSs with spaced phase shifters have been used to monitor the optical wavefront and transmission of light, resulting in lenses, holograms, and polarization-selective devices that are all compact optical components. BB has been observed in both metallic and dielectric MS axicons [ 178 179 ]. MS-based devices may provide subwavelength spatial resolution, which is needed to deflect light by large angles contrasting to traditional phase modulating devices. This is required for high numerical aperture optical components, such as axicons and lenses, to produce beams with even smaller FWHM. Scanning microscopy [ 180 181 ], optical manipulation [ 182 ], and lithography [ 183 ], among other uses, all need subwavelength FWHM to attain high-level spatial resolution, strong trapping force, and subwavelength feature sizes, respectively.
BBs are traditionally created using an objective with an annular aperture at the front focal plane, as suggested by Durnin [ 52 53 ], or with an axicon lens, as suggested by Herman and Wiggins [ 151 ]. The axicon lens solution was more commonly used since the first approach has poor quality, with most incident waves being obstructed by the aperture [ 129 154 ]. The introduction of metasurface (hereafter referred to as MS) flat optics [ 155 156 ], which allowed for advanced regulation of phase and amplitude on a subwavelength scale as well as management of dispersion properties, gave a new impetus to the expansion of axicon lens [ 157 159 ]. The Huygens theorem defines light propagation as a wavefront formed by the sum of spherical wavelets. Each meta-atom (MA) can be considered as the source of a spherical wavelet as light impinges on MSs. Surprisingly, the geometric variables, rather than the material conformation of nanostructures, govern the amplitude, phase, polarization, and even dispersion of spherical wavelets. The wavefront can be shaped at will in this way to produce flat optical elements with superior performance, even multifunctional ones, or to structure light by forming vector beams with complete control of polarization, which would otherwise need multiple optical components and be outside the competence of spatial light modulators (SLMs) [ 160 ]. This technique has been used to suggest and explain BB generators based on MS [ 161 ]. MSs are two-dimensional metamaterials made up of a group of subwavelength MAs that have been meticulously engineered [ 162 164 ]. By altering the shapes and orientations of the MAs on a subwavelength scale, these surfaces can have an impact on the phase, amplitude, and polarization of output light. MSs have recently attracted a lot of research attention because they provide a lot of versatility in terms of engineering their EM properties. MSs special optical properties would allow for the implementation of a wide range of novel phenomena and functionalities not found in natural materials. MSs are now commonly used in nonlinear photonics, optical OAM [ 165 166 ], optical rotation [ 167 ], invisibility cloaking [ 168 ], metalenses [ 169 170 ], and holography [ 171 172 ], among other applications.
In [ 175 ], the self-assembly of an embedded micometer-scale oblate axicon refractive lens is reported. This falls under the category of micro-axicon, a subset of axicons that has sparked interest thanks to lens demonstrations on planar [ 211 ], fiber [ 212 214 ], and bulk materials [ 215 ]. The created lens resembles an oblate axicon, which when launched produces a quasi-BB that is guided in the substrates planar optical layer. The manufacturing process uses consolidated high-purity glass soot to monolithically mount an optical fiber to an optical planar substrate. The soot is deposited using flame hydrolysis deposition (FHD), which uses mass flow controllers to adjust the refractive index, stress, and thickness of the subsequent glass. The embedded optical fiber (IOF) network [ 216 ] has shown environmental reliability [ 217 ], physical monitoring [ 218 ], and refractometry [ 219 ] so far. Figure 12 fk demonstrates the fabrication process of IOF. For a detailed study, consult [ 175 ].
Link to Hongsheng
The on-chip axicon has previously been shown, but it is a 2D computer designed for light-sheet microscopy [ 209 ]. An axicon lens creates a plane illumination in light-sheet microscopy to minimize background noise when viewing a broad field of view. It needs lower excitation intensities in conjunction with fluorescence dyes than other fluorescence imaging techniques for identical image acquisition times and spatial resolutions. As a result, it is used in long-exposure experiments where a high dose of light may harm the sample. The silicon nitride-based devices direct light 10 μm from the chips edge into free space, with a beam waist of 1 μm [ 209 ]. Using optical phased arrays, another on-chip axicon-like system was exhibited in the Sisubstrate [ 210 ]. The system generates a quasi-1D BB of up to 14 mm Bessel length and an FWHM of 30 μm vertical to the direction of light propagation using a 1D splitter-tree based architecture. In [ 43 ], a NDB is produced using an on-chip SOI platform. Circular gratings with seven stages of 1 × 2 multimode interferometers make up the device. The authors present a method for azimuthally apodizing gratings by splitting the circles into arcs, which effectively improved the penetration depth in the gratings from 5 µm to 60 µm. The axicon, shown in Figure 12 d is a 1.52 × 1.38 mmunit with 7 levels of 1 × 2 MMIs that merge, or split light and 128 final ports arranged around the central axicon structure [ 43 ]. Figure 12 e depicts the simulation results of the E-field intensity distribution [ 43 ].
In [ 207 ], an MS-based axicon lens incorporated on a Si WG was used to produce near-field imaging of the propagating diffraction-free Bessel-type beam in a guided wave configuration as shown in Figure 12 a. The axicon lens operation is focused on regional modification of the nof the Si WG with plasmonic nano-resonators, which has a footprint of just 11 μm. This generalized technique, which can be applied to a variety of planar lightwave circuit platforms, allows for the expansion of nano-engineered optical elements using plasmonic resonators to manipulate light at the nanoscale. The experimental characterization based on end-fire coupling and scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM) evaluations in collection mode is shown in Figure 12 b [ 207 ]. Figure 12 c gives the SNOM evaluation for the beam intensity profile before and after the axicon [ 207 ]. A photonic crystal-based device, in which the holes in the system were created using genetic algorithms, was another attempt to create integrated photonic lenses [ 208 ]. Although this unit has a beam waist of just 293 nm, the focus is only 5 μm from the device, and most notably, the axicon action is 2D, making it only suitable for light sheet applications. The small focus range, along with the reality that the focus is inside the slab itself, makes it unsuitable for imaging, optical traps, and other applications [ 208 ].
While most attempts to propagate NDBs are based on free-space optical applications [ 201 202 ], guided-wave optics is now searching for ways to ensure long-distance paralleled beam propagation. Self-collimation properties can be achieved using 2D photonic crystal (PhC) structures in the traditional technique [ 203 205 ]. However, it is mostly used to propagate single lobe GBs. At the subwavelength scale, the phase and amplitude of the wavefront must be adapted to implement a Bessel-type profile. It is difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish this mission utilizing a PhC solution established on the interference of waves travelling forward and backward in a slab waveguide (hereafter represented as WG) with a regularly altered dielectric index pattern. Integrating plasmonic nano-resonators on the surface of the dielectric WG, on the other hand, allows for efficient subwavelength modulation of the propagating waves phase and amplitude [ 206 ]. The fundamental method is established on the evanescent coupling of plasmonic nano-resonators to a portion of the light propagating in the WG. The local phase change of the directed wave is affected by the extra delay affected by the trapping of light by the nano-resonators. By tuning the geometric parameters of this hybrid MS-dielectric WG, such as evanescent field coupling in plasmonic nano-resonators, their surface density, resonance frequency, and quality factor, the modulation of the local phase and amplitude can be regulated. Effectual medium constraints for instance the nof the WG can be added within the legitimacy limit of the homogenization technique, where all distinctive evaluations are far below the wavelength and the Bragg resonant interfaces can be ignored [ 206 ].
In this review, we examined four modern types of optical devices that allow implementing the functions of a classic conical axicon with additional options. In this section, we will briefly discuss the specifics of these implementations.
Refractive conic axicons have definite advantages such as high energy efficiency and low chromatic dispersion. However, manufacturing of refractive axicons of anticipated quality poses some challenges due to the difficulty of the technology and the lack of simple approaches of control and certification of conical surfaces. Another disadvantage is the limitation of the numerical aperture (NA) value by approximately 0.75.
Diffractive axicons are free from these imperfections, so they can be used for sharp focusing with NA 1 with sufficiently high energy efficiency. Moreover, diffractive axicons as annular gratings with a subwavelength period can be used for polarization conversions, which expands the functions of classical axicons. Diffractive optical elements (DOEs) are compact and relatively inexpensive optical elements, which can greatly simplify and reduce the size of optical systems. However, DOEs are characterized by a high chromatic dependence and provide a high-quality formation of a designed field only when illuminated by laser radiation with a certain wavelength matched to the height of the diffraction microrelief.
The use of spatial light modulators (SLMs) provides functions similar to those provided by DOEs. However, SLMs and DOEs are not interchangeable devices, as each has its features. SLMs tend to be supporting the implementation of a multi-level phase profile, while the fabrication of multi-level DOEs is not easy (just binary elements are the easiest to fabricate). The undoubted advantage of SLMs is the possibility of dynamic control of the generated light fields. The limitations of SLMs are also well known: the relatively low damage threshold and low efficiency of commercially available devices. This somewhat limits the use of SLMs with high power lasers, where it is safer to use DOEs. Moreover, SLMs are quite expensive devices. Thus, SLMs and DOEs with similar functionality are used in different applications depending on the characteristics of each device described above.
An interesting new type of axicons is meta-axicons. In addition to the compactness of such optical elements, the main advantage of metasurfaces is the ability to simultaneously perform both amplitude-phase and polarization transformations of the incident radiation. However, metasurfaces are more difficult to manufacture than diffractive gratings, since they have a substantially subwavelength characteristic structure size. Therefore, the most widespread metasurfaces have been acquired for the radiation of long wavelengths (THz and far infra-red range).
Note that such multifunctional compact structures as meta-axicons are very promising for use in waveguide structures. This is one of the rapidly developing areas, which requires a high technological base for the implementation/manufacture of various types of multiplexing and sensor devices.
In the next section, we examined the possibility of using simpler diffractive axicons to test the quality of optical devices, elements, and systems, as well as analyzers of wavefronts and laser beams.
With the use of a negative and positive axicon lens, ring diameter can be adjusted to fit the needs by manipulating the distance between the two axicons. Whats the tips to design it? We share it here.
An axicon lens, is a conical prism defined by its alpha (α) and apex angles, also known as a rotationally symmetric prism, is a lens that features one conical surface and one plano surface. They are commonly used to create a beam with a Bessel intensity profile or a conical, non-diverging beam.
Plano-concave axicons have a plano surface in combination with a concave conical surface. Concave axicon produces a ring shaped image along the axis from a point light source (e.g. Gaussian laser beam).
An axicon deflects light according to Snells Law, which can be used to find the deflection angle:
where n is the index of refraction of the glass, α is the physical angle of the prism, and ß is the angle the deflected beam creates with the optical axis. Here, the refractive index of air is assumed to be 1. This interaction is illustrated in the reference image to the right.
The axicon can replicate the properties of a Bessel beam, a beam comprised of rings equal in power to one another. The Bessel beam region may be thought of as the interference of conical waves formed by the axicon. A Bessel beam is a non-diffracting beam of concentric rings, each having the same power as the central ring.
The absolute value of a 0th order Bessel function. A true Bessel Beam requires each ring to have the same energy as the central peak, thus an infinite amount of energy is needed.
When the beam is projected further from the lens, a single ring-shaped beam is formed. The beam is actually conical (i.e., diameter increases with distance), but the rays are non-diverging so that the thickness of the ring remains constant. The rings thickness will be half of the input laser beams diameter. This type of beam is commonly used in laser-drilling applications. The thickness of the ring (t) remains constant and is equivalent to R( the beam entering the axicon)
The simplified equation again assumes small angles of refraction. The diameter of the ring is proportional to distance.
DOF is a function of the radius of the beam entering the axicon (R), the axicons index of refraction (n), and the alpha angle
The intensity distributions of the resulting Bessel and ring-shaped Gaussian beams are influenced by tip imperfections. The central lobe of the zero-order Bessel beam shows intensity oscillations rather than spatial invariance if the tip is rounded, while the hollow Gaussian beam features an asymmetric ring with a tail towards the center or secondary rings.
Please note that the non-zero peak at the center of the ring is an expected feature since only an ideal, perfect axicon will have high intensity edges and zero-intensity everywhere else. By improving the apex rounding diameter and reducing surface imperfections of the axicon, the contrast between the high intensity region and the nonzero center can be improved.
An Axicon example is attached here for your reference and study. Axicon Beam example