Diffuse reflecting (white) and highly absorbing (black) fused silica based materials are presented, which combine volume modified substrates and surfaces equipped with anti-reflective moth-eye-structures. For diffuse reflection, micrometer sized cavities are created in bulk fused silica during a sol-gel process. In contrast, carbon black particles are added to get the highly absorbing material. The moth-eye-structures are prepared by block copolymer micelle nanolithography (BCML), followed by a reactive-ion-etching (RIE) step. The moth-eye-structures drastically reduce the specular reflectance on both diffuse reflecting and highly absorbing samples across a wide spectral range from 250 nm to 2500 nm and for varying incidence angles. The adjustment of the height of the moth-eye-structures allows us to select the spectral position of the specular reflectance minimum, which measures less than 0.1%. Diffuse Lambertian-like scattering and absorbance appear nearly uniform across the selected spectral range, showing a slight decrease with increasing wavelength.
You can find more information on our web, so please take a look.
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement
The fabrication of optical components in fused silica from an initial liquid state, such as sol gel processes [1] or modern glassomer techniques [2] have gained considerable attention in the last years and decades. These techniques combine an exceptional flexibility in producible element types with the outstanding physical properties of fused silica such as its high chemical and thermal stability, as well as their excellent optical characteristics. The broad diversity of optical elements in fused silica manufactured from an initial liquid phase comprise diffractive elements [2], micro-cone textures for solar cell application [3], three-dimensional suspended hollow microstructures [4], micro-structured optical fibers [5], and microlens arrays [6] to name only a few. In essential, all these listed elements profit from the transparency of fused silica.
In this contribution, we demonstrate that a liquid based sol-gel process for fused silica is highly advantageous for non-transparent optical applications as it allows the fabrication of extremely absorbing and diffuse reflecting optical elements.
Diffuse reflective surfaces are used e.g. in integrating spheres or as test targets to calibrate spectrophotometers or image sensors. In particular, such diffusers are key components for the calibration of earth observation satellite sensors necessary for climate research, agriculture or environmental monitoring [7–9]. Especially for space applications, the diffusers are exposed to extreme and harsh conditions.
On the other hand, a high absorbance is of enormous importance for applications such as solar cell technology, improving the performance of infrared cameras or for preventing stray light in optical instruments such as telescopes, microscopes or projection units. Here, vertically aligned carbon nanotube (VACNT) showed their superior absorbance properties with an extremely low reflectance from the visible to the far-infrared [10–12] but suffer from touch-sensitivity and their vulnerability to external mechanical influences.
For both the highly absorbing and the diffuse reflecting fused silica, we modified a sol-gel process and applied a subsequent surface modification step creating sub-wavelength sized structures in the materials surface. In essential, the modified sol-gel process involves the adding of specific filler particles to the initial sol state and an appropriate treatment of the resulting xerogel in a step before the final high temperature sintering process is applied.
The highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting properties of the material are mainly based on volume effects caused by the micrometer and sub-micrometer sized filler particles or remaining cavities in the bulk material. A further improvement of diffusing properties and absorbance is achievable by suppressing disturbing specular reflection effects caused by the refractive index step at the interface between the two media of the fused silica substrate and the surrounding ambient air. In particular, subwavelength structured optical surfaces have proven their ability to minimize reflection effects, specifically in terms of broadband capabilities and usability over an extremely wide range of incidence angles [13,14]. These subwavelength antireflective (AR)-structures are also found in nature, for example on transparent butterfly wings [15] or on the corneal surfaces of night active insects [16,17], and with relation to their natural model, they are also called moth-eye-structures. In essential, the AR properties of moth-eye structures are based on a gradual decrease of the effective refractive index offering a smooth transition from the environmental medium to the bulk material, and therefore allow to minimize Fresnel reflection losses. For the application on volume modified sol-gel fused silica, we applied a specific manufacturing process for these moth-eye-structures, based on a combination of block copolymer micelle nanolithography (BCML) followed by a reactive-ion-etching (RIE) process [18]. The combined BCML-RIE process offers a high flexibility and the useable wavelength range can be extended to both the ultraviolet (UV) [19] and to the near-infrared (NIR) [20].
The manufacturing process of the substrate material for diffuse reflecting and highly absorbing fused silica is mainly based on well established procedures for clear or highly transparent sol-gel quartz glass [6]. The essential modification concerns the inclusion of concentrated cavities with dimensions in the micrometer range or respectively a low amount of nanometer sized, absorbing carbon particles. Since the basic process is the same for both the diffuse reflecting and the absorbing material, we simultaneously describe in the following the manufacturing steps in detail and indicate the essential differences. For visualization, the essential process steps are schematically depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Sol-gel process to prepare diffuse reflecting (above) and highly absorbing (bottom) fused-silica substrates.
Download Full Size | PDF
In a first step the chemical precursor solution sol is mixed from demineralized water, tetra-ethyl-orthosilicate (TEOS: Si(OC2H5)4; Dynasylan A, Evonik) and colloidal pyrogenic silica (OX50; Evonik) in a molar ratio of 25/1/4 until hydrolysis between TEOS and water ends. A pH value of 4.9 is adjusted by adding a 0.1 Mol/l ammonia solution drop by drop. According to this ratio, the hydrolyzed sol has a mass density of approximately 1.1 g/cm3.
In this stage, micrometer sized spherical particles, respectively the carbon black nanoparticles are added to the sol and the mixture is stirred for several minutes. In the case of the added carbon black nanoparticles, the mixture is additionally treated by ultra-sonic. In order to suppress agglomeration of the carbon black particles in the sol, it is advantageous to pretreat the carbon black particles with surfactant- or dispersing-agents. In analogy, to prevent sedimentation or floating up of the added spherical micro particles, their mass density should be close to those of the sol.
In particular, we used monodisperse polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) spheres with a diameter of 5.5 µm (PM006UM; microParticles GmbH). To finally create an opaque silica glass body containing appr. 2 × 109 cavities/cm³ we added PMMA spheres with a mass-percentage of 3% to the sol. On the other hand, for the highly absorbing fused silica, we used Acetylen carbon black particles with an average diameter of 42 nm (MFCD00133992; abcr GmbH) pretreated with a surfactant agent (Triton - X114; Fisher Scientific UK). Here, 0.075% (weight percent) Acetylen carbon black was mixed to the sol.
After stirring and ultra-sonic treatment, the mixture is poured into a mold where a gelation process starts, forming the randomly linked three-dimensional silica network with liquid filled nanometer sized pores (wet-gel) in approximately 30 minutes. The wet-gel carries the integrated PMMA microspheres or carbon black particles, respectively, in a homogenous distribution.
Thereafter, the wet-gel is removed from the mold and dried in air for 7 days at constant room temperature and at humidity levels between 80–30% following a defined drying regime. During the drying process the initial wet-gel is transferred into a xerogel by removal of the liquid phase in the nanometer pores. In this phase, the gel experiences already a partial volume shrinkage, which will finally end in an overall volume reduction of 50%.
The subsequent process steps for the manufacturing of both diffuse reflecting and highly absorbing fused silica differ in detail from each other so that they are separately described in the following.
In case of the diffuse reflecting fused silica, the PMMA spheres have to be removed completely from the silica network in the next step. This is necessary to guarantee high quality quartz characteristics dominated by scattering properties and minimizing potential absorption effects. The PMMA spheres are removed from the xerogel in an oven at approximately 500 °C under oxygen atmosphere. To prevent the formation of cracks the temperature is increased slowly over a period of 24 hours. As a cleaning procedure the xerogel is then exposed for several hours to a hydrogen chloride atmosphere with a simultaneous increase of the temperature to 800 °C. After completion of the cleaning process, several flushing steps with oxygen are performed. In the xerogel, the remaining cavities have the same size as the initial polymer spheres. Finally, the xerogel is densified in a sintering process under a helium atmosphere at 1350 °C for about 10 minutes. Here, the nanometer sized pores in the silica network of the xerogel collapse, while the cavities of the initial spheres are shrinking but still remain in the medium. The final cavities in the silica glass have diameter of appr. 3.5–4 µm, are helium gas filled and represent a homogenously distributed non-open porosity.
For the highly absorbing fused silica the prepared xerogel is cleaned by an exposition to an inert gas atmosphere for several hours. In analogy to the process for diffuse fused silica, also here the temperature is increased to 800 °C and simultaneously accompanied with several flushing steps. This procedure helps to remove the residual water as well as the free gaseous oxygen from the silica network and protects the carbon black particles from burning. In a final step, the xerogel is densified in a sintering process under the same inert gas atmosphere at 1300 °C in about 60 minutes. Here, the nanometer pores in the silica network of the xerogel collapse and trap the carbon black particles into the glassy SiO2 network. The final silica glass appears visually deep black and contains appr. 2.500–3.000 ppm (weight) carbon black particles homogenously distributed.
During the sintering phase the fused silica was cleaned by hydro-chlorine gas to remove trace impurities. In this stage OH-groups will be removed automatically, leading to an average OH-content of 0.1 ppm (weight) in the final dense bulk material.
The resulting fused silica substrates are small cylindrical plates with a diameter of 20 mm and a thickness of 1 mm. These substrates are mostly smooth only locally interrupted by some distributed intrusions where the filler particles partially appear in the surface. Incoming light incident on the untreated substrate surface experiences a refractive index step which is associated with reflections following the Fresnel-laws. In case of the cavity-filled silica glass, the specular reflections disturb the spatial homogeneity of the diffuse stray-light, or for the carbon black filled silica glass the reflections significantly limit the maximum absorbance. In order to avoid these effects, it is necessary to equip the fused silica surfaces with anti-reflection properties. Commonly, anti-reflection coatings for optical elements are based on single or alternating dielectric layer systems, which make use of interference effects for reflection suppression. These layer-based systems are only applicable to a limited wavelength range and are also characterized by restricted tolerances against the incidence angle.
An alternative are surface relief structures with spatial periodicities in the sub-wavelength range, which are also called moth-eye-structures in accordance with their natural model. These moth-eye-structures offer a graded refractive index transition between the ambient air and the substrate material and therefore drastically reduce Fresnel-reflections. In addition to their broad wavelength applicability and the large incidence angle tolerances moth-eye-structures offer also the advantage that they can be directly incorporated into the substrate material so that no additional layer material is necessary. This possibility increases the stability against temperature changes and enhances laser radiation stability [20].
For our purpose, to equip the volume modified sol-gel fused silica with moth-eye-AR structures we applied a process combination of block copolymer micelle nanolithography (BCML) followed by reactive-ion-etching (RIE) [18]. The combined BCML-RIE process is highly flexible and allows to cover an extended wavelength range from the ultraviolet (UV) [19] to the near-infrared (NIR) [20,21]. The process, schematically depicted in Fig. 2, starts with the formation of spherical micelles by dissolving polystyrene-blockpoly(2)-vinylpyridine (PS-b-P2VP) in o-Xylene and the loading of the cores of the micelles with a gold salt (HAuCl4). Subsequently, the loaded micelles were transferred from the solution to substrates by spin coating. The resulting mono-micellar film shows a hexagonal pattern with a center distance of ∼105 nm ± 10 nm. For our applications we aspired a periodic mask structure, because a randomized disturbance of the lateral periodicity is assumed to reduce the transmission of the incoming light into the bulk material especially in the short wavelength range [22]. In particular, for the carbon black filled samples this effect will disturb the light absorption property.
Fig. 2. Preparation of anti-reflective moth-eye-structures on the surfaces of the volume modified fused silica. The process starts with BCML in which micelles are arranged quasi-periodically on top of the substrate. This is followed by a reactive ion etching step. The indicated hollow (half sphere) in the fused silica represents a residual cavity occurring randomly in the sol-gel process for the diffuse reflecting sample.
Download Full Size | PDF
In particular, in case of the diffuse reflecting fused silica, the mono-micellar film covers both the flat areas of the substrate as well as, at least partially, the hollow induced by the removing of the spherical micro-meter sized PMMA particles. After a plasma treatment in which the polymer matrix is removed and the gold precursor is reduced, a mask of elemental gold nanoparticles remains on the substrate, which serves as an etching mask for the following RIE process. The height of the moth-eye-structures is adjusted by different etching recipes, involving the composition of the etching gas and the sequence of the particular etching steps. In particular, we manufactured samples with different nanopillar heights representing specular reflectance minima at wavelengths of about 500 nm, 750 nm, 1000 nm and 1500 nm, respectively. For spectral position adjustment, the specular reflectance minimum was measured successively accompanying the etching process. The final corresponding nanopillar heights are found by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to be approximately 200 nm, 305 nm, 420 nm and 680 nm. In [20] it was demonstrated that the reflectance minimum can be shifted by increasing the pillar heights to wavelengths larger than 2400 nm.
A contamination of the surface during the moth-eye-structuring process is not observable, in particular, the etching-mask is completely disappearing during the RI-etching. Potential contaminations arising later during the use of the moth-eye-structures are removable by appropriate cleaning steps [23]. The manufactured moth-eye-structures offer a high stability, especially they show a significant higher laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) than classical multilayer based anti-reflection coatings [20].
In the following, the different samples are indicated by a letter which distinguishes between diffuse reflecting (‘d’) or highly absorbing (‘z’) samples followed by a number denoting the position of the specular reflectance minimum. For example, d1000 represents the diffuse reflecting sample with a specular reflectance minimum at 1000 nm, and z500 stands for the highly absorbing sample with a specular reflectance minimum at 500 nm.
To visualize the effect of moth-eye-structured surfaces on both highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting samples, Fig. 3 shows photographs in which the AR-coated samples are compared with the respective non-surface treated fused silica plates. In the upper image of Fig. 3, both non-structured (left) and AR-equipped (right) plates of the highly absorbing samples are located on a white underlay. Behind the fused silica samples, a black background paper is placed on which letters and symbols are printed in white color. On the non-structured sample, a mirror image of the letter ‘A’ and the ‘smiley’ symbol becomes clearly visible, indicating a reduced but still recognizable reflection. In opposite, the moth-eye-structured sample on the right appears completely dark showing no reflection effects. The lower image of Fig. 3 shows the situation for the diffuse reflecting samples. Hereby, the colors of the underlay and the background with the letter and symbols are inverted. Also here, the non-structured sample (left) shows a recognizable mirror image, whereas on the moth-eye-equipped sample reflections are hardly visible.
Fig. 3. Photographs of the highly absorbing (top) and diffuse reflecting (bottom) fused silica samples. The black and white samples are placed on a contrast inverted underlay. In the background letters and symbols are printed on black or white paper. On the non-structured samples (left), mirror images of the letter and symbols become clearly visible, indicating Fresnel reflections. In contrast, these reflections nearly vanish for moth-eye-equipped samples (right).
Download Full Size | PDF
Figure 4 displays SEM images of the resulting structures for exemplary diffuse reflecting and highly absorbing samples. For the SEM images, the sample surfaces were covered with a thin chromium layer. Figure 4(a) shows the surface of the diffuse reflecting sample d750 in an overview with low magnification and in a perpendicular view. A flat surface interspersed with statistically distributed spherical hollows becomes visible. The hollows, all with similar diameters smaller than ∼ 4 µm, are the residuals of the initial PMMA spheres, which are removed in the final stage of the substrate manufacturing process. An image analysis of Fig. 4(a) results in a coverage of ca. 8% by the hollows with respect to the entire surface. At this magnification level, the surface of all other diffuse reflecting samples (d500 … d1500), which are not shown, have the identical appearance compared to d750.
Fig. 4. SEM images of a diffuse reflecting sample ((a), (b)) and of a highly absorbing sample ((c), (d)). The left column ((a), (c)) displays an overview for both samples, in the right column ((b), (d)) a FIB-cut allows a detailed view also from the volume of the samples.
Download Full Size | PDF
For a more detailed view Fig. 4(b) shows a section of the d750 sample in higher magnification, captured at an oblique angle of 54°. From the observed area a part with a trapezoidal base was extracted by the application of a focused ion beam (FIB). The volume extraction by the FIB allows to get an inside view into the 3D volume structure of the sample substrate. The figure shows in the center three prominent spherical shaped hollows in the surface, from which the one on the left is cut in the center by the FIB. The flat surface of the sample is covered by homogeneously distributed moth-eye-structures. It can be seen that the moth-eye-structures are also covering the bottom of the hollows. The moth-eye-structures have a height of approximately 305 nm. When looking at the outer parts of the hollows it follows that the heights of the moth-eye-structures are decreasing with increasing sidewall steepness. With the FIB sectioning, also an empty sphere with a diameter of ∼ 4 µm becomes visible inside the substrate volume. For a better visualization the respective part of the image is contrast enhanced and indicated by a green dotted rectangular.
Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show SEM images of the highly absorbing sample z1500 recorded at an oblique angle of 54°. In particular, Fig. 4(c) displays an overview of the sample surface. The surface is homogeneously covered with moth-eye-structures and especially surface defects, comparable to the hollows occurring in the diffuse reflecting samples, are not recognizable. The rectangular shaped flat area at the rear on the right is an artificially prepared platinum layer, which serves for stabilizing and to achieve smooth cutting-edges during the subsequent FIB-cutting process. Figure 4(d) depicts the structures at a FIB cutting edge. The moth-eye-structures below the stabilizing platinum layer have a height of ∼ 680 nm. The transition between moth-eye-structured surface and underlying substrate is clearly indicated by a contrast change. The moth-eye-structures appear not to be freestanding individual pillars but seems to be randomly connected at their upper ends. The edge of the FIB-cut shows small intrusions inside the substrate volume, which are attributed to the particles or small aggregates of the carbon black.
Essential characteristics of the diffuse reflecting and highly absorbing fused silica samples concern their specular and diffuse reflectance properties, as well as the total hemispherical reflectance. For the respective wavelength dependent measurements, we used a spectrophotometer (Lambda 1050; Perkin Elmer) covering a wavelength range from 250 nm up to 2500 nm with a measurement uncertainty of < 0.5%. In order to analyze the scattering properties in more detail, the angle resolved scattering [24,25] was measured using the 3D scatterometer Albatross developed at Fraunhofer IOF [26] in combination with a supercontinuum light source that can be spectrally filtered between 470 nm and 1700nm using acousto-optical tunable filters. It should be noted that the highly absorbing samples with a thickness of 2 mm show no detectable transmitted light signal. For the diffuse reflecting samples, the ratio between reflected and transmitted portion can be tailored by adjusting the quantity of the PMMA spheres in the initial sol and by the thickness of the samples. For the presented diffuse reflecting samples the specular and diffuse scattering was only measured in reflection. In contrast, for the angle resolved scattering measurements the signals were recorded for both forward (transmission) and backward (reflection) direction.
In a first step, we measured the reflectance for perpendicular incidence. Therefore, the samples were mounted at the exit aperture of the spectrophotometers integrating sphere. In this setup, the wavelength adjusted probe ray enters the integrating sphere at the entrance aperture and directs towards the sample. In order to enable that also the back reflected specular contribution is kept inside the integrating sphere, we adjusted the incidence angle not exactly to 0° but selected a slightly larger angle (∼ 6°). In direction of the specular reflection, the integrating sphere is equipped with a detachable segment, which allows to differentiate between measurements of pure diffuse reflectance (removed segment - specular contribution leaves the integrating sphere) and of total hemispherical reflectance (integrated segment - both diffuse and specular contribution are detected).
In the following, we present the measurement results of diffuse and specular reflectance for the different moth-eye-structured’ highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting fused silica samples, as well as for the respective unstructured reference samples. For the specular reflectance, we subtracted the measured diffuse reflectance from the total hemispherical signal.
Figure 5(a) shows the measured specular reflectance for the highly absorbing fused silica. The surface-unstructured reference sample shows a reflectance which is very similar to pure fused silica. For comparison we also added the reflectance properties of pure fused silica calculated from literature values of the refractive index [27] (dark yellow line). Across a broad spectral range, the reflectance of the surface-unstructured highly absorbing reference sample is nearly identical to the curve representing the calculated literature values. Small deviations of both curves appear in the deep UV and in the long IR wavelength range, which may be attributed to surface defects of the highly absorbing fused silica sample.
Fig. 5. Specular reflectance (above) and diffuse reflectance (bottom) for both highly absorbing (left) and diffuse reflecting fused silica.
Download Full Size | PDF
The samples equipped with moth-eye-structures show a completely different specular reflectance behavior. All four curves representing structured surfaces with different profile heights show qualitatively a similar behavior. In the short wavelength range, all curves show a local reflectance maximum which is smaller than 0.5%. With increasing wavelength, the curves are reaching their minimum at a level of the measurement accuracy, which measures a reflectance of less than 0.1%. With a further increase of the wavelength, the specular reflectance is again rising. The wavelength position of the absolute minimum shifts to longer wavelengths with increasing profile height of the moth-eye-structures. In particular, for the four samples we measured reflectance minima at 500 nm, 750 nm, 1000 nm and 1500 nm, respectively. These values of the reflectance minimum positions were also used to indicate the curves of the different samples in the diagram (z500…z1500). All four curves show a specular reflectance which is smaller across the entire spectral range than for the unstructured reference sample. In particular, it is remarkable that the specular reflectance curve for the largest profile height (z1500), exhibiting a reflectance minimum at 1500 nm, shows a reflectance smaller than 0.6% across the entire addressed wavelength range.
The measurements of the specular reflectance for the diffuse reflecting samples show a very similar behavior compared to the respective highly absorbing fused silica (see Fig. 5(b)). Again, the surface structured samples exhibit a reflectance minimum in the range of the measurement accuracy of approximately less than 0.1% at their individual target wavelengths. Also here, for the largest profile height and a reflectance minimum at about 1500 nm the curve shows a small specular reflectance with values below 0.5% over the total spectral range.
A comparison of the corresponding curves shows, that the measured specular reflectance for the diffuse reflecting samples is always a little smaller than for the highly absorbing fused silica. In particular, a maximum difference of 0.5% is found for the samples which are not equipped with moth-eye-structures. The samples with moth-eye-structures show a smaller difference with a minimum of smaller than 0.25% for the largest profile heights. This finding may be attributed to the randomly distributed hollows occurring in the surface of the diffuse reflecting samples and which are caused by the removal of the PMMA spheres during the sol-gel process (compare Fig. 4(a)). The hollows in the surface induce scattering effects and the appearing diffuse stray light reduces the contribution of the specular reflectance. In the highly absorbing fused silica samples surface defects are widely missing.
In Figs. 5(c) and (d) the measured diffuse reflectance is displayed for both highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting fused silica. For these measurements the detachable segment is removed from the integrating sphere so that only the stray-light is detected with the exception of the specular reflected contribution.
The highly absorbing fused silica shows a very small diffuse reflectance over the entire spectral bandwidth (see Fig. 5(c)). The curves for the unstructured reference sample and for the moth-eye-structured samples with different profile heights show only very small differences. In detail, the reference sample exhibits a slightly higher (∼0.025%) diffuse reflectance in the wavelength range from 1000 nm up to 2200 nm. Overall, all samples show a very small diffuse reflectance. In the short wavelength range the diffuse reflectance measures less than 0.5%, which uniformly decays to the infrared wavelengths with a minimum smaller than 0.17% at 2250 nm. In the deep UV and also in the IR at around 2500 nm, the reflectance increases discernible.
The diffuse reflecting samples show a diffuse reflectance of about 70% over the investigated spectral range (see Fig. 5(d)). Because of the limited thickness of the samples (∼1 mm) not all of the incident light is reflected (diffuse or specular) and a residual amount is transmitted as diffuse background without a specular component. Within a collection cone of ±0.3° centered around the specular beam direction, the transmitted light power amounts to 0.001% for all four structured samples as determined during the angle resolved light scattering measurements. For the highly absorbing samples, the specular and scattered transmitted light was below 10 ppm during the light scattering measurements. In the spectral range from approximately 500 nm to 2500 nm the unstructured reference and all moth-eye-structure equipped samples show nearly uniform curves for the diffuse reflectance, which slightly decay to the larger wavelengths. In detail, for the reference sample the diffuse reflectance is noticeable smaller compared to the structured samples. This effect can be attributed to the differences in the specular reflection of the different sample types.
The differences in the wavelength dependent behavior of the four samples equipped with moth-eye-structures are mainly based on their different specular reflection properties. The diffuse hemispherical reflectance is highest for the sample with the largest profile height for wavelengths larger than ∼1200 nm, which matches to the minimum of specular reflectance for this sample in the respective spectral range. In the adjacent shorter wavelength range (< 1200 nm) the sample with the next smaller profile height (indicated as d1000) shows the minimum specular reflectance. This correlates with the maximum diffuse reflectance for this sample in the corresponding wavelength range. With a further decrease of the wavelength (< 800 nm) the sample with the subsequent smaller profile height should show maximum diffuse reflectance. This is not observed but the respective curve shows the smallest diffuse reflectance for all moth-eye-structure equipped samples. This finding is not fully clear but may origin on a slightly different sample thickness compared to the other samples.
In the very short wavelength range (< 450 nm) the unstructured reference sample on the one hand and the moth-eye-structured samples on the other hand show a significant different behavior. While the diffuse reflectance for all moth-eye-structured samples is considerably increasing, the unstructured sample shows a remarkable decay. The increase of diffuse reflectance for the moth-eye-structured diffuse reflective samples in the sub-450 nm-range corresponds to the similar behavior for the highly absorbing samples. In opposite, the deviation of the unstructured diffuse reflective reference sample may be explained with the reduction of scattering effects of the hollows with decreasing wavelength.
In the next step we investigated the specular reflectance for the different samples for varying incidence angles. For these measurements we changed the experimental setup and used the TAMS setup of the spectrophotometer (TAMS: Total Absolute Measurement System). The samples are fixed in an angle-adjustable mounting and the specular reflected light is captured by the input aperture of an integrating sphere. The angle position of the detector aperture is also adjusted by the TAMS. The diameter of the detector aperture is a little larger than the spot size of the specular reflected light. This means, that in addition to the specular reflected light also potentially a small amount of diffuse reflected light is detected with this configuration.
For both highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting samples we measured the angle dependent specular reflectance for the moth-eye-structured samples with the maximum profile heights and for the respective unstructured reference samples. The incidence angles were varied between 10° and 60° in steps of 10°.
Figures 6(a) and (b) show the angle dependency for both unstructured reference samples. All curves show a nearly uniform behavior with a slight decay for increasing wavelength. For incidence angles up to 30° the specular reflectance curves for each unstructured sample show only marginal differences in their absolute values.
Fig. 6. Angle dependency for both diffuse reflecting ((a), (c)) and highly absorbing fused silica ((b), (d)). The upper row displays the behavior for the unstructured reference samples, the row at the bottom shows the angle dependency for substrates equipped with moth-eye-structures exhibiting a specular reflectance minimum at about 1500 nm at perpendicular incidence. With varying incidence angles the spectral position of the minimum is shifted.
Download Full Size | PDF
A further increase of the incidence angles results in a drastic increase of specular reflectance. In particular, we measured approximately 8% for the unstructured highly absorbing sample and slightly above 7% for the respective diffuse reflecting sample. Again, the small difference between highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting samples can be attributed to additional scattering effects caused by the surface hollows of the diffuse reflecting sample.
The moth-eye-structured samples show a different behavior compared to the unstructured reference samples but present a similar characteristic among highly absorbing and diffuse reflecting samples (see Figs. 6(c) and (d)).
For small incidence angles (≤ 30°) the specular reflectance curves are similar to the previously discussed perpendicular incidence (see Figs. 5(a) and (b)). Across the entire wavelength range, the specular reflectance measures less than 1%. With increasing incidence angle, the specular reflectance significantly increases in the long wavelength range but remains low at short wavelengths. Additionally, the curves indicate that the minimum in the specular reflection shifts to smaller wavelength with increasing incidence angle.
Again, the slightly lower values of specular reflectance for the diffuse reflecting samples compared to the highly absorbing samples over the entire spectral range are due to the additional scattering caused by the hollows of the diffuse reflecting sample.
Essentially, a comparison of all curves shows that also for large incidence angles the specular reflectance is well below the comparable value of the respective unstructured sample. Particularly wide differences occur for wavelengths shorter than approximately 1500 nm. In this range the moth-eye-structures reduce the specular reflectance from approximately 8% to less than 1.5%.
In order to study the scattering properties in more detail, the angle resolved light scattering was measured within the plane of incidence from 470 nm to 1700 nm with the scatterometer Albatross. The incidence angle was fixed to 3° with respect to the surface normal. Exemplary, results for the diffuse reflecting fused silica are shown in Fig. 7. In the following, the mathematically positive polar scattering angle is counted with the respect to the macroscopic sample normal in the plane of incidence. Thus, the angles from -90° to +90° correspond to the backward scattering direction and the scattering angles ranging from -90° to -270° are indicating the forward scattering direction, respectively. Close to 90°, -90°, and 270° the sample holder blocks the scattered light, leading to a drop of the scattering signal.
Fig. 7. Angle resolved light scattering measurements of diffuse reflecting fused silica at an angle of incidence of 3°: (a) Backward scattering distribution in the plane of incidence at a wavelength of 1000 nm for different samples (step size polar scattering angle = 1°); (b) Wavelength dependency for sample d750. At a polar scattering angle of 3°, the incident light is blocked by the detector causing the obscuration in the measurement signal. The specular reflected beam can be observed at -3°.
Download Full Size | PDF
Figure 7(a) shows a logarithmic plot of the ARS as a function of the observation angle at a wavelength of 1000 nm for the four different surface structured diffuse reflecting samples. For comparison, the scattering distribution of a Spectralon sample (Spectralon SRS-99; Labsphere), which can be regarded as an almost perfect Lambertian scatterer [28], is also displayed. The Spectralon sample exhibits a total hemispherical reflectance (specular and diffuse part) of 99%.
All four structured diffuse reflecting fused silica samples are very similar in their scattering behavior with an almost identical ARS that is comparable to the scattering distribution of the reference Spectralon, however with a slightly lower amplitude. The moth-eye structured samples exhibit a small specular reflectance peak, which is missing for the Spectralon. This peak is however continuously decreasing in amplitude for increasing structure heights. The strong similarity of the scattering distribution for the surface structured diffuse reflecting fused silica compared to a Lambertian scatterer is also preserved for the visible and NIR spectral range, which is illustrated in Fig. 7(b). Explicitly, Fig. 7(b) shows the ARS of sample d750 for both backward (reflection) and forward (transmission) direction for a broad wavelength range in a color-coded diagram. The color display shows no significant changes in the angle dependency for the whole observed wavelength spectrum. In the forward scattering direction (transmission), the angle resolved scattering is also Lambertian-like and roughly a factor of 2 below the scattering level of the backward direction. A distinctive specular peak cannot be identified in forward scattering direction.
For the highly absorbing fused silica, the results from the angle resolved scattering measurements are plotted in Fig. 8. Again, the angle of incidence was set to be 3°. Figure 8(a) displays a logarithmic diagram of the ARS as a function of the observation angle at a wavelength of 1000 nm for the four different surface structured highly absorbing samples. Instead of the white Lambertian scatterer, a black Spectralon sample (Spectralon SRS-02; Labsphere) including absorbing carbon particles, is introduced as a reference which exhibits a total hemispherical reflectance of 1% at 1000 nm.
Fig. 8. Angle resolved light scattering measurements of highly absorbing fused silica at an angle of incidence of 3°: (a) Backward scattering distribution in the plane of incidence for a wavelength of 1000 nm (step size polar scattering angle = 1°); (b) Wavelength dependency for sample z750. At a polar scattering angle of 3°, the incident light is blocked by the detector causing the obscuration in the measurement signal. The specular reflected beam can be observed at -3°.
Download Full Size | PDF
The highly absorbing fused silica samples exhibit a diffuse scattering distribution as well, which is similar among the four structured samples. Their shape is similar to the black Spectralon, which suggests that the light scattering is mainly caused in the bulk material. The surface structuring only affects the specular reflected peak, which is comparable in amplitude to those of the diffuse fused silica. Except for the specular beam direction, the scattering signal for all structured highly absorbing samples is below the respective values for the black Spectralon, which indicates stronger absorption of the fused silica samples compared to the reference. Figure 8(b) displays the ARS of sample z750 in the backward direction ranging from 470 nm to 1700 nm. This wavelength plot also reveals a very homogenous scattering distribution in the entire covered spectral range.
For a further comparison to a Lambertian scatterer, the encircled energy around the specular beam in reflection direction was determined for the different surface structured fused silica samples. Therefore, the ARS-functions displayed in Figs. 7(a) and 8(a) were integrated with the assumption of an isotropic scattering distribution, meaning that the scattering is equal for all azimuthal scattering angles. The resulting encircled energy plots are presented in Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Encircled energy around specular beam in reflection direction: (a) diffuse reflecting fused silica in comparison to a Lambertian scatterer at 1000 nm and (b) highly absorbing fused silica in comparison to a black Spectralon at 1000 nm.
Download Full Size | PDF
In case of the diffuse reflecting fused silica, all samples show a very similar behavior for the encircled energy as a function of the polar scattering angle (see Fig. 9(a)). In comparison to the reference of a Lambertian scatterer (Spectralon SRS-99) the curves have the same shape but differ in the achieved maximum value, which is only 60% for the fused silica samples and 100% for the reference, respectively. This gap is mainly attributed to the transmission effects associated with the fused silica samples. In more detail, when combining both the backward and the respective forward scattered light, the resulting curve for the encircled energy is nearly identical to the reference curve for the Lambertian scatterer. This is shown as the dotted line in Fig. 9(a), which is calculated exemplary for the sample d1500. This illustrates that the gap in the maximum achieved encircled energy between surface structured diffuse reflective fused silica and Lambertian reference can be minimized by increasing substrate thickness of the samples.
The encircled energy plots for the surface structured highly absorbing fused silica differ to the black Spectralon (Spectralon SRS-02) more clearly (see Fig. 9(b)). A first essential difference concerns the offset at 0° which is related to the specular reflected beam. Here, for the four samples z500…z1500 the offsets are different, which corresponds to the wavelength dependent specular reflection at the measurement wavelength of 1000 nm (see Fig. 5(a)).
Consequently, the offset exhibits a minimum for sample z1000 and a maximum for z500. Additionally, towards larger off-specular angles, the scattering intensity is only increasing marginally for the black fused silica samples and much less than the black Spectralon. Thus, the highly absorbing fused silica differs to a Lambertian scatterer. But for an application as an absorber this is beneficial as the primary focus lies on the absorption properties and not necessarily on the shape of the scattering distribution. Furthermore, the encircled energy curve for the sample z1000 is well below the corresponding curve for the reference Spectralon for off-specular angles larger than 20°, demonstrating the high absorption capabilities of the surface structured fused silica substrate.
In conclusion, we equipped volume modified fused silica substrates with a nanostructured surface to create anti-reflective properties. The volume modification is realized by adding filler particles or micrometer sized cavities during the sol-gel fabrication process of fused silica which results in highly absorbing or diffuse reflecting samples, respectively. The spherical, nearly equal sized cavities in the fused silica lead to strong scattering and thus white appearance, offering a homogeneous diffuse reflection across a wide spectral range. In contrast, carbon black particles in the fused silica are absorbing most of the incoming light and the respective samples appear black. The antireflective behavior is based on artificial moth-eye structures, which are created by a BCML step and subsequent RIE etching. The moth-eye-structures reduce significantly specular reflection effects at the samples surface over a large spectral range and for large incidence angle variations. Because the volume and the surface of the material in essential consists of pure fused silica, it offers a high potential for applications under harsh environmental conditions, such as expected e.g. for space applications, strong temperature changes or for the use with high power lasers. The desired characteristics of the material have to be tested and investigated in following research. The idea of volume modified fused silica by adding particles during a sol-gel-process offers a wide field of additional changes and optimization steps to tailor its optical characteristics. For example, a replacement of the micrometer sized spheres by ellipsoidal particles and in addition an oriented implementation of these particles into the fused silica volume, will introduce anisotropic scattering effects, which allow to reshape the diffuse scattering to a desired distribution.
For more information, please visit Hebei Silicon Research Electronic Materials Co., L.
Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Digitale Gesellschaft (2018 VF 0027); Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N14000).
The authors would like to express their deepest thanks to Ivo Stemmler and Birgit Eggersdorfer from PerkinElmer for the important support.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
1. L. C. Klein, „Sol-Gel Glasses,“ in Springer Handbook of Glass, J. D. Musgraves, J. Hu, and L. Calvez, eds. (Springer, 2019), pp. 1333–1354.
2. F. Kotz, N. Schneider, A. Striegel, A. Wolfschläger, N. Keller, M. Worgull, W. Bauer, D. Schild, M. Milich, C. Greiner, D. Helmer, and B. E. Rapp, “Glassomer—Processing Fused Silica Glass Like a Polymer,” Adv. Mater. 30(22), 1707100 (2018). [CrossRef]
3. M. Langenhorst, D. Ritzer, F. Kotz, P. Risch, S. Dottermusch, A. Roslizar, R. Schmager, B. S. Richards, B. E. Rapp, and U. W. Paetzold, “Liquid Glass for Photovoltaics: Multifunctional Front Cover Glass for Solar Modules,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(38), 35015–35022 (2019). [CrossRef]
4. F. Kotz, P. Risch, K. Arnold, S. Sevim, J. Puigmartí-Luis, A. Quick, M. Thiel, A. Hrynevich, P. D. Dalton, D. Helmer, and B. E. Rapp, “Fabrication of arbitrary three-dimensional suspended hollow microstructures in transparent fused silica glass,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1439 (2019). [CrossRef]
5. H. El Hamzaoui, L. Bigot, G. Bouwmans, I. Razdobreev, M. Bouazaoui, and B. Capoen, “From molecular precursors in solution to microstructured optical fiber: a Sol-gel polymeric route,” Opt. Mater. Express 1(2), 234–242 (2011). [CrossRef]
6. T. Kreuzberger, A. Harnisch, M. Helgert, L. Erdmann, and R. Brunner, “Sol–gel process to cast quartz glass microlens arrays,” Microelectron. Eng. 86(4-6), 1173–1175 (2009). [CrossRef]
7. G. T. Georgiev and J. J. Butler, “Long-term calibration monitoring of Spectralon diffusers BRDF in the air-ultraviolet,” Appl. Opt. 46(32), 7892–7899 (2007). [CrossRef]
8. G. T. Georgiev, J. J. Butler, C. Cooksey, L. Ding, and K. J. Thome, “SWIR calibration of Spectralon reflectance factor,” Proc. SPIE 8176, 81760W (2011). [CrossRef]
9. G. T. Georgiev, J. J. Butler, K. Thome, C. Cooksey, and L. Ding, “Preliminary results of BTDF calibration of transmissive solar diffusers for remote sensing,” Proc. SPIE 9972, 997205 (2016). [CrossRef]
10. Z.-P. Yang, L. Ci, J. A. Bur, S.-Y. Lin, and P. M. Ajayan, “Experimental Observation of an Extremely Dark Material Made By a Low-Density Nanotube Array,” Nano Lett. 7(11), 3249–3252 (2007). [CrossRef]
11. J. Zhu, Z. Yu, G. F. Burkhard, C.-M. Hsu, S. T. Connor, Y. Xu, Q. Wang, M. McGehee, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, “Optical Absorption Enhancement in Amorphous Silicon Nanowire and Nanocone Arrays,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 279–282 (2009). [CrossRef]
12. S. P. Theocharous, E. Theocharous, and J. H. Lehman, “The evaluation of the performance of two pyroelectric detectors with vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube coatings,” Infrared Phys. Technol. 55(4), 299–305 (2012). [CrossRef]
13. S. Chattopadhyay, Y. F. Huang, Y. J. Jen, A. Ganguly, K. H. Chen, and L. C. Chen, “Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng., R 69(1-3), 1–35 (2010). [CrossRef]
14. R. Brunner, O. Sandfuchs, C. Pacholski, C. Morhard, and J. P. Spatz, “Lessons from nature: biomimetic subwavelength structures for high-performance optics,” Laser Photonics Rev. 6(5), 641–659 (2012). [CrossRef]
15. R. H. Siddique, G. Gomard, and H. Hölscher, “The role of random nanostructures for the omnidirectional anti-reflection properties of the glasswing butterfly,” Nat. Commun. 6(1), 6909 (2015). [CrossRef]
16. C. G. Bernhard, “Structural and functional adaptation in a visual system,” Endeavour 26, 79–84 (1967).
17. D. G. Stavenga, S. Foletti, G. Palasantzas, and K. Arikawa, “Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 273(1587), 661–667 (2006). [CrossRef]
18. T. Lohmueller, M. Helgert, M. Sundermann, R. Brunner, and J. P. Spatz, “Biomimetic interfaces for high-performance optics in the deep-UV light range,” Nano Lett. 8(5), 1429–1433 (2008). [CrossRef]
19. C. Morhard, C. Pacholski, D. Lehr, R. Brunner, M. Helgert, M. Sundermann, and J. P. Spatz, “Tailored antireflective biomimetic nanostructures for UV applications,” Nanotechnology 21(42), 425301 (2010). [CrossRef]
20. Z. Diao, M. Kraus, R. Brunner, J.-H. Dirks, and J. P. Spatz, “Nanostructured Stealth Surfaces for Visible and Near-Infrared Light,” Nano Lett. 16(10), 6610–6616 (2016). [CrossRef]
21. M. Kraus, Z. Diao, J.-H. Dirks, K. Weishaupt, J. P. Spatz, K. Täschner, H. Bartzsch, R. Schmittgens, and R. Brunner, “Combined ‘moth-eye’ structured and graded index-layer anti-reflecting coating for high index glasses,” Opt. Express 27(24), 34655–35664 (2019). [CrossRef]
22. D. Lehr, M. Helgert, M. Sundermann, C. Morhard, C. Pacholski, J. Spatz, and R. Brunner, “Simulating different manufactured antireflective sub-wavelength structures considering the influence of local topographic variations’,” Opt. Express 18(23), 23878–23890 (2010). [CrossRef]
23. Z. Diao, J. Hirte, W. Chen, and J. P. Spatz, “Inverse Moth Eye Nanostructures with Enhanced Antireflection and Contamination Resistance,” ACS Omega 2(8), 5012–5018 (2017). [CrossRef]
24. V. Rehn, V. O. Jones, J. M. Elson, and J. M. Bennett, “The Role of Surface Topography in Predicting Scattering at Grazing Incidence from Optical Surfaces,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods 172(1-2), 307–314 (1980). [CrossRef]
25. M. Trost and S. Schröder, “Roughness and Scatter in Optical Coatings,” in Optical Characterization of Thin Solid Films, 64O. Stenzel and M. Ohlídal, eds. (Springer, 2018), pp. 377–405.
26. S. Schröder, D. Unglaub, M. Trost, X. Cheng, J. Zhang, and A. Duparré, “Spectral angle resolved scattering of thin film coatings,” Appl. Opt. 53(4), A35–A41 (2014). [CrossRef]
27. I. H. Malitson, “Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55(10), 1205–1209 (1965). [CrossRef]
28. Labsphere, Technical Guide: Reflectance Materials and Coatings. https://www.labsphere.com/site/assets/files/2553/a-guide-to-reflectance-materials-and-coatings.pdf, (accessed August 19, 2020)
Pharmaceutical design is currently based on the Quality by Design (QbD) concept, a new, systematic, risk-based methodology. QbD begins with predefined objectives and dwells on product and process understanding, along with process control [77,78,79,80]. QbD requires: (i) knowledge of the physiologic barriers NPs face within the human body, (ii) complete characterization of NPs materials, and (iii) fully understanding of the NP synthesis process.
The US National Cancer Institute has pointed out that most engineered NPs are far less toxic than household cleaning products, insecticides used on family pets, or over-the-counter dandruff remedies, which are present at order-of-magnitude higher levels than the engineered NPs [ 89 ]. Moreover, in their use as carriers of chemotherapeutics in cancer treatment, engineered NPs are much less toxic than the drugs they carry.
As to toxicity, amorphous silica solubility (~120–170 ppm, at the temperature and pH of the body fluids, 36–37 °C and 7.35–7.45, respectively), allowed an easier silica elimination (as silicic or poly(silicic) acid) which are non-toxic and diffuse through the blood stream or the lymphatic system to be eventually cleared in the urine, preventing its accumulation in kidneys, liver or spleen (contrary to the crystalline polymorphs counterparts) [ 87 , 88 ]. Amorphous silica phases lacked the regular long-range order purposed by the classical crystal growth and dissolution models which difficult the understanding of its dissolution mechanism. Yet, a-SiO 2 phases shared with the silica crystalline polymorphs the fundamental unit, the (SiO 4 ) 4− tetrahedron, and short range structural order (at length scales up to 20 Å), despite variations in Si-O-Si bond lengths and angles. The a-SiO 2 atomic scale disorder enabled the loss of surface (SiO 4 ) 4− Q 3 units into solution (creating vacancy islands) and keeping unchanged the a-SiO 2 surface Gibbs energy. As a consequence, dissolution rates of amorphous silica phases, which involves an equilibrium between the solid phase and dissolve monomer Si(OH) 4 , scaled linearly with increasing driving force (undersaturation). At pH values above 8, the presence of [H 3 SiO 4 ] ion in addition to Si(OH) 4 is responsible for the high silica solubility at this pH values (as the concentration of Si(OH) 4 in equilibrium with the solid silica phase is not pH dependent).
Several methods have been developed to mask or camouflage NPs from the MPS or renal clearance. The most preferred of these methods is the adsorption or grafting of poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) to the surface of NPs. Addition of PEG and PEG-containing copolymers to the surface of NPs resulted in an increase in the blood circulation half-life of the NPs by several orders of magnitude. This method created a hydrophilic protective layer around the NPs that is able to repel the absorption of opsonin proteins via steric hindrance, thereby blocking and delaying the first step in the opsonization process [ 81 ]. Moreover, PEGylation prevents NPs aggregation in solution, which helps keep them from forming a cluster once in blood vessels, where they could otherwise embolize and occlude blood flow resulting in microinfarctions at distant sites and organs.
Renal clearance (based on physical filtration, dialysis) is a second optimal method for expelling NPs from the body. As a first approximation, removal by the renal system occurs only for polymeric molecules with a molecular weight of around 5000 or less, or inorganic NPs with hydrodynamic diameters smaller than 8 nm. Dendrimers (with molecular weights as high as 100,000) and NPs larger than 8 nm (if somehow broken down into fragments smaller than 6 nm after drug release) may also be cleared by the renal system [ 86 ]. Non-biodegradable NPs and degradation molecules with a molecular weight higher than the renal threshold typically become sequestered in the MPS organs ( ).
Finally clearance occurs. The phagocytes begin to secret enzymes and other oxidative molecules (like superoxides, oxyhalide molecules, nitric oxide, and hydrogen peroxide) to ingest (chemically break down) the phagocytosed material [ 81 ]. Unfortunately, most non-biodegradable NPs cannot be degraded significantly by this process and, depending on their relative size and molecular weight will either be removed by the renal system or sequestered and stored in one of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) organs.
After opsonization, phagocytosis occurs. Macrophages (typically Kupffer cells of the liver or spleen) cannot directly identify the NPs themselves, but rather recognize (through specific, non-specific receptors or complement activation) opsonin proteins adsorbed to the NPs surface [ 81 ]. Macrophages may uptake foreign materials within a matter of minutes (after opsonization), increasing the phagocytosis rate for positively charged and bacteria-specific proteins and render them ineffective as nanocarriers [ 83 ].
Opsonization is the process by which a foreign organism or particle becomes covered with biologic proteins (opsonins), forming a coating (named corona by materials scientists or opsonins in pharmaceutics) thereby making it more visible to phagocytic cells. The exact mechanism through which opsonization is activated is complex and is not yet fully understood. When the opsonin proteins (blood serum components like laminin, fibronectin, C-reactive protein, type I collagen, components of the complement proteins such as C3, C4, and C5 and immunoglobulins [ 81 , 82 ]) come into close contact with engineered NPs, typically by random Brownian motion, they may adsorb on NPs surface through van der Walls, electrostatic, ionic or hydrophobic/hydrophilic attractive forces. Protein opsonization usually takes place in the blood circulation system and may hold from few seconds to many days to complete.
The biological performance (pharmacokinetics profiles, biodistribution, target recognition, therapeutic efficacy, inflammatory reactions and toxicity) of intravenously injected NPs is controlled by a complex array of interrelated physicochemical and biological factors, starting with opsonization, followed by phagocyte ingestion and ending with NPs clearance. [ 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ]. Rapid blood clearance limits drugs/gene/therapeutic molecules/markers accumulation at target delivery sites, while NPs accumulation in macrophages (within clearance organs) initiates inflammatory responses, inducing toxicity [ 85 ].
As regards the renal system, neutral surface charge gives the highest chance to pass through renal filtration (and being excreted in urine), while both positively and negatively charged NPs adsorbed more serum proteins, increasing their hydrodynamic diameter and thus reducing their ability to be eliminated [ 91 ]. Unlike the long time clearance process taken by bile (or other MPS organs), the renal system removes the NPs from the body through the urine, with minimal side effects [ 88 ].
NPs may differ in surface chemical composition, a critical parameter in determining their drug-loading efficiency, releasing profile, circulation half-life, tumor targeting and clearance from the body. A hydrophilic surface makes the NPs more resistant to the plasma proteins adsorption (preventing the formation of corona) and thus avoiding their recognition and uptake by the MPS. Coating the NP surface with a hydrophilic polymer (like PEG) or directly synthesizing NPs with hydrophilic surface compounds (in situ synthesis) are two strategies to overcome the challenge. Rapid opsonization and clearance is observed for NPs with excess positive surface charges [ 90 ].
As to shape, NPs may exhibit an extensive range of geometries—from spherical to tubular, through centric, eccentric and star like. While spherical NPs are good candidates for drug delivery, anisotropic structures can sometimes provide higher efficiencies in drug deliver (due to a more favorable configuration with the cell), although the sharp edges and corners may induce injuries to blood vessels. NPs may be hollow, dense, nanostructured, or in core-shell (eventually with multiple cores) structures, enhancing the NP load capacity and specific targeting ability.
As far as size is concerned, NPs may exhibit different size profiles and different shell thicknesses (in core-shell structures), showing in all cases an outstanding surface-to-volume ratio, responsible for an extremely active/reactive surface performance. Size determines in vivo distribution, intracellular uptake, toxicity, and targeting ability, influencing drug loading, drug release, and in vivo and in vitro stability. Smaller particles have a great risk of aggregation during storage and incubation in vitro, but have higher mobility and longer circulation half-life in vivo. To run an effective and reproducible biomedical NPs system, monosized distribution is required, usually between 10 and less than 200 nm.
During the last decades, remarkable efforts have been made to develop novel NPs synthesis methodologies. Today, it is generally accepted that nanosize cannot be efficiently achieved by the traditional top-down methodologies (such as ball milling and lithography) but rather by bottom-up techniques. A bottom-up strategy looks faster, precise, and cost-effective.
A bottom-up strategy holds a large number of techniques (flame spray pyrolysis, chemical vapor deposition, and wet-chemistry methodologies like co-precipitation, hydrothermal, solvothermal and sol-gel) but research has been focused on sol-gel, as the synthesis is straightforward, scalable, easily controllable, time and energy saving. The sol-gel chemistry comprises chemical reactions involving colloidal particles in a sol, or between alkoxide-precursors and water, in a solution, leading to a highly porous amorphous gel product, in which a liquid phase (solvent, catalyst and eventually excess reactants) may be retained in bulks (3D), films (2D), fibers (1D), powders, and NPs (0D) products [39,92]. The sol-gel SiO2 NPs synthesis comprises four common methods: (i) colloidal routes, (ii) biomimetic syntheses, (iii) solution routes (base- and acid catalyzed)) and (iv) templated syntheses (the last one dedicated to mesoporous silica NPs, a topic outside the scope of this short review).
In colloidal routes, sol-gel SiO2 NPs are formed in an aqueous medium through the supersaturation, polymerization and (eventual) precipitation of silica polymorphs. In the geological world silica NPs of ~1 nm (basically orthosilicic acid, a weakly acidic molecule with pKa ~9.8) undergo rapid growth to 2–4 nm, at pH 2–3 (as pHPZC ~2.2; ζ ~0 mV at pH ~2–3, facilitating NPs growth). As silica solubility increases well above pH 7 particles grow up to 4–6 µm by coalescence and Ostwald ripening (pH >> pHPZC, and ζ < −30 mV). At pH > 9 (the ionized form of monomeric silicic acid Si(OH)3O− predominates) silica NPs cement to form a bulk gel, originating opal-like structures [38,39]. Ostwald ripening of silica particles originates from surface instability of silicon dioxide and is driven by differences in chemical potential between particles of different size and shape. The local radius of curvature and ratio of surface area to volume accounts for the particle’s surface energy, which is greater in the case of small particles or those with rough surfaces. Under kinetically favorable conditions these high surface energy particles dissolve preferentially, with the material being deposited onto particles with the largest radius. Silica dissolution proceeds via cleavage of siloxane bonds on the NPs’ surface (which is faster in amorphous structures), resulting in the release of soluble silicic acid ( ).
Open in a separate windowCommercial precipitated silica, formed from sodium silicate solution and sulfuric acid, has the largest share of global market of silica particles (in classical industries), a position that is expected to grow in the next decade [2,3,4].
In the biological world plants, diatoms and sponges are capable of accumulating, storing and processing Si to create biogenic silica (at mild ambient conditions and under-saturated aqueous solutions of silicic acid). Several factors affected the process of natural silica condensation, namely concentration of silicic acid, temperature, pH, and the concentration of co-precipitating/nucleating agents (external small molecules and polymers) [93]. Plants started by taking up Si in the form of Si(OH)4] or Si(OH)3O− (present in soils at concentrations as low as few mg kg−1). When the silicic acid concentration is in excess of 100–200 mg kg−1, polycondensation reactions occur at final location, forming silica polymers equal or higher in size than the critical nuclei size. The viable nuclei grow to form spherical NPs, as the absence of crystallographic patterns promotes isotropic spherical growth. The final SiO2 NPs are amorphous at the 1-nm length scale [94], built up from SiO4 tetrahedron with variable Si-O-Si angles and Si-O bond distances. However, a great variety of medium/long range order patterns may be found in nature (branched chains, structural motifs or even hierarchical patterned structures) resulting in different density, hardness, solubility, viscosity and composition values [54,55,93]. As the silica NPs reach 1–3 nm in size, they interact with plant cell walls (due to the negatively charged silica NPs surfaces, at neutral pH).
As to diatoms, there are more than 105 species with unique frustule architectures ( ). The micro- and nano-sized diatoms can be also produced by cultivation, and here purification and chemical modification protocols are well established to generate pure active biohybrid materials [95]. Furthermore, the production of diatoms is environmentally friendly (compared to synthetic silica-based NPs), due to absence of toxic waste products and low energy consumption. Diatoms are considered to be harmless thanks to the amorphous silica structure [96], and food grade diatomaceous earth has been approved in the USA to feed animals and there are already several human grade diatomite silica microparticles products on the market in Europe and Australia [97]. The potential of silica diatoms for oral drug delivery applications, in intestinal (pH 7.2) and simulated GIT (pH 1.2–7.4) fluids [98,99,100] was recently demonstrated ( ).
Open in a separate windowMimetic natural SiO2 production is gaining ground, and represents a source of inspiration for green eco-production processes. In biomimetic silica synthesis particle formation can occur by the use of certain co-precipitating/nucleating (biologic or biomimetic) agents, under neutral or acidic conditions. As research on the biogenic silica production has progressed, key molecules (such as silicateins, silaffin R5, proteins, peptides, carbohydrates, lipids, metal ions and phenolic compounds) that participate in the silicification of microorganisms have been found. Several studies have identified alternate amine-molecules as candidates for inducing silica precipitation from precursor compounds in vitro. These amine groups thus impart the silica with a strong positive surface charge (populated with -NH3+ groups, ζ ≥ 30 mV) in acid and neutral pH, thus stabilizing the silica sol and allowing the NPs growth through Ostwald ripening [113,114]. Spherical porphyrin-functionalized SiO2 NPs were biomimetically synthesized with diameters between 50 nm and 800 nm. However, high quality silica NPs with a diameter less than 50 nm still remains a long term challenge [115,116,117,118]. Nearly monodisperse SiO2 NPs, with tunable size between 10 nm and 200 nm, were synthesized in aqueous media by using lysine [119,120] and arginine [121,122] as base catalysis. Cationic block copolymer micelles [123] and cationic poly(acrylamine-co-2-(dimethylamine) ethyl methacrylate, methyl chloride quaternized) (poly (AM-co-DMC)) [124] and polyalylamine hydrochloride (PAH) [125] were used as colloidal template for the biomimetic deposition of 35 nm silica NPs. Protein immobilization (biomolecules encapsulation) within biomimetic silica NPs has been investigated for a wide variety of enzymes [126,127,128,129,130], bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein [131] and has even proved successful for the entrapment of different enzymatic proteins [132].
The solution route is the most common sol-gel synthesis process. Here metallic salts, metal alkoxides, or other organometallic precursors undergo hydrolysis and condensation, to form a wide range of sol-gel products. The right choice of catalyst, pH, water to silica precursor’s ratio (to control hydrolysis rate), type of solvent and solvent to water ratio (to enhance reactants mixing), type of silicon precursor (as R may have inductive and steric effects on hydrolysis rate), the presence of chelating agent (to control the relative hydrolysis to condensation rate) and finally the temperature, allow the control of SiO2 structure, size and/or morphology ( ). Due to the hydrophobic nature of the alkyl groups organometallic precursors and water are not miscible, and the addition of a common solvent (usually an alcohol) becomes mandatory to promote miscibility between reactants. In the case of silica synthesis, the low polarity of the Si-O bond in silicon alkoxide (the Si atom bear δ+ = 0.32 low positive charge in TEOS) is responsible for the slow sol-gel progress, rendering catalysis essential.
Open in a separate windowSol-gel basic conditions confer negative surface charges to the silica monomers (pH >> pHPZC, and ζ ≤ −30 mV), which (kinetically) stabilize the silica suspension, allowing the formation of NPs. Above pH 7, maximum NPs growth is achieved, as a consequence of the increase in silica solubility, which promotes depolymerization of siloxane bonds, and produces monomeric silica necessary for the aging process. As to NPs, Stöber developed a mild synthetic protocol (room temperature, pH ~9–11) for growing (quasi)monodispersed spherical NPs (with diameters between 50 nm and 2 mm) based on sol-gel silicon alkoxides and sodium silicate solution (SSS) as seeds ( ). An alkoxide precursor (such as TEOS) is hydrolyzed (in an ethanol solution) to produce silicic acid, which then undergoes a condensation reaction to form amorphous silica NPs. Arkhireeva and Hay [133] obtained sub-200 nm NPs by slightly modifying the Stöber method. On the other hand, synthesized SiO2 NPs (in sub-100 nm size range) present high polydispersity and irregular shape. Zou et al. [30] proposed a procedure to produce monodisperse spherical SiO2 NPs with sizes ranging between 30–100 nm, based in the classical two-dimensional LaMer [134] model. The strategy is built upon an effective selection of reaction conditions for the Stöber method, and relies on a modification of the conceptual classical LaMer model of nucleation and particle growth. The LaMer methodology, supported on the protocols by Arkhireeva et al. [133] allow the synthesis of NPs at room temperature in less than 1 h.
Open in a separate windowGenerally acid conditions favor the production of gels, as the silica formed in acid solutions possesses little or no surface charge (zeta potential will be in the tricky range of ζ < |30 eV|, PZC silica ~ pH = 2.2) facilitating flocculation/connectivity between silica species. Here the hydrolysis step is typically the fastest, but condensation begins before hydrolysis is complete. Condensation often occurs in terminal silanols, resulting in chain like structures in the sol and network-like gels. Linear or highly branched polymeric species are formed, given rise to 3D structures.
To synthetize SiO2 NPs under acid-catalyzed process a reverse-micelle (or water-in-oil microemulsion) system is formed by adding water, oil and surfactant. The hydrolysis and condensation reactions will develop in the confined reaction vessels (formed by the dispersed aqueous phase in the continuous oil matrix ( )). The confined nanoreactor environment is shown to yield highly monodisperse NPs and allow the incorporation of non-bonded non-polar molecules, which are often difficult to incorporate into the hydrophilic silica matrix. In the last few years, several dye-doped SiO2 NPs have been synthesized by the reverse microemulsion technique in which polar dye molecules are used to ensure successfully encapsulation into SiO2 NPs [135].
Open in a separate windowThe reverse microemulsion process is widely used in silica NPs synthesis. However, besides having low yields, the reverse microemulsion process uses a large amount of potentially toxic surfactants and organic solvents, and demands previous washing to biological application, in order to avoid disruption or lyses of biomembranes. The Stöber’s method arises as more eco-friendly alternative, in which the hydrolysis and condensation of a mixture of alkoxysilanes takes place in mild basic aqueous medium, to create monodisperse, spherical, electrostatically-stabilized particles. Recently (ammonia free) Stöber silica NPs were synthesized under basic catalyzed ensured by hydrothermal water (SPA Cabeço de Vide, Portugal, pH ~11) [136].
The Stöber method is a promising method for producing surfactant free silica NPs or coatings; yet the final particles size remain in the hundreds of nanometers to micron regime, which are too large to some of the biological studies. LaMer alternative allows the control of particles size and dispersion, but a regular shape (silica NPs < 100 nm) is still difficult to obtain. NPs prepared through the microemulsion method, exhibited smooth surfaces and low polydispersity. However, for use in biomedicine, the microemulsion method is not as safe as the Stöber one; the use of surfactants in the NPs synthesis carries a higher risk of cytotoxicity.
Stöber silica NPs are largely used in oral applications on account of their chemical stability and intrinsic hydrophilicity, being thus appropriate for biological environments. AEROPERL® 300 Pharma (particle size of 30 mm) is used in formulations of hesperidin oral delivery carrier [137], hydrophylic Aerosil 380 (7 nm in size) is used to stabilize Pickering emulsions in lipid-based oral delivery systems [138,139,140]. Oral insulin bioavailability was tested in a SiO2 nanoplatform (silica NPs associated with insulin and then coated with mucoadhesive polymer, like chitosan or PEG) [100,102] ( ).
Sol-gel allows in situ incorporation of a variety of functional (non-hydrolysable) organic groups within the silica matrix, in order to increase their biocompatibility, improve its resistance to enzymatic action, internalization efficiency and gene targeting (either in Stöber or reverse emulsion methods). The ORganically MOdified SILica matrix (known as ORMOSIL [141,142]) is an alternative material with even better and more versatile properties than silica: the presence of non-hydrolysable organic groups in the alkoxisilane precursors makes these behave like glass modifiers, reducing the degree of silica network cross-linking as well as increasing the network flexibility as the unhydrolyzed—Si-R bond apparently dangles, causing higher mobility during gelation and undergoing weaker contraction during drying. A tunable wettability, by a judicious choice of the ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic sol-gel precursor monomers, a tailor made porosity (size and shape) and a shell hardness/complacency making ORMOSIL a very competitive material. Furthermore, ORMOSIL NPs surfaces will be populated with both silanol and non-hydrolysable organic groups, allowing an easier chemical conjugation/decoration of biomolecules at the NPs surface and/or be loaded with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic drugs or dyes. Mammalian cells take up and internalize easily silica/ORMOSIL NPs (without any cytotoxic effect) opening the door to its use in health science [143].
Among the commonly used functionalizing groups, amine (–NH2) is the first choice when gene transfection is designed for gene therapy or vaccination. The –NH2 groups electrostatically interact with proteins, enhancing their absorption, biding and protecting pDNA from enzymatic digestion allowing cell transfection in vitro. ORMOSIL NPs have great potential in DNA delivery; ORMOSIL transfection efficiency was equal to or even better than Herpes Simplex Virus-1 (HSV-1)) and does not cause any damage to the tissue nor has immunological side effects that have commonly been observed with viral-mediated gene delivery [144]. ORMOSIL NPs crossed the blood brain barrier (BBB) in fruit fly insects [145] where no toxic effects on the whole insect organism or their neuronal cells were observed. Biodistribution and clearance in vivo studies (mice) using ORMOSIL NPs showed a greater accumulation in liver, spleen and stomach than in kidney, heart and lungs. Although, clearance studies carried out over 15 days period indicated hepatobiliary excretion of the NPs in the same mice [146].
Core-shell structures have great potential in future biomedical applications, since they constitute a scaffold to create multifunctional NPs, applied to several medical fields, from theranosis to gene delivery performance. Sol-gel Stöber method, by simply replacing the nucleating agent SSS (commonly used in the synthesis of plain SiO2 NPs) by another nanosized system, enables its coating. Superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONs) [48], and liposomes [147] are selected nanosystems, due to their academic and industrial relevance ( ).
Open in a separate windowSPIONs, the only clinically approved metal oxide NPs [48], have an excellent response to external magnetic fields. However, administration route and SPIONs surface properties dictate their ultimate effect in terms of the efficiency of cellular uptake, biodistribution, and potential toxicity. SPIONs with hydrophobic surfaces are rapidly and efficiently opsonized and cleared from mammal’s circulation system, while SPIONs with hydrophilic surfaces resist these processes being slowly cleared. Silica/ORMOSIL coating emerge as an interesting coating material, granting hydrophilic surface properties, decreasing SPIONs high aggregation tendency, protecting SPIONs from oxidation and thus increasing their blood circulation time [148].
Liposomes are excellent carriers due to their capacity to load hydrophilic and/or hydrophobic molecules, to penetrate in altered vasculatures (due to pathological situations like in cancer or inflammation), to drug release at target sites (over prolonged periods which may vary from hours to weeks) [149]. In clinic, for intravenous administration, there are already several pharmaceutical systems where drugs are encapsulated in liposomal structure. However, when oral administration is envisaged and gastrointestinal tract mucus and epithelium barrier need to be overcome, the protection of liposomes from anticipated disruption becomes a promising strategy [150]. The emerging of silica-based drug delivery carriers for oral route administration was the leitmotiv for silica-coating of liposomes, LIPOSIL for short [151].
Simply silica hollow-sphere NPs (another core-shell possibility) are capable of carrying large amounts of payload or fill their cores with other desirable materials such as polymers, gold or silver along with the gene delivery performance. They can be created through the condensation of alkoxysilanes onto polymer based templates, metal organic frameworks or other nanomaterials, lately removed by chemical etching or thermal degradation [150].
Template synthesis is dedicated to the production of mesoporous materials, topic out of the scope of this short review. A very short summary of synthesis process is presented. The seminal work conducted by researchers at the Mobil Oil Corporation in the early 1990s on the synthesis of mesoporous silicates has led to a number of syntheses in which surfactants are used as templates [152]. Ordered mesoporous materials are unique materials that are defined by an ordered and repetitive mesostructured of pores and disordered arrangement at the atomic level. Their synthesis is based on the use of surfactants that act as templates to direct the morphology of the final amorphous material. Simply, the synthesis process starts with the dissolution of surfactant molecules into polar solvents to yield liquid crystal suspensions. The pair surfactant/solvent defines the working phase diagram. When the surfactant concentration is above the critical micellar concentration (CMC) then the surfactant molecules self-assembly into micelles. Higher surfactant concentrations allow the formation of micellar cubic, hexagonal or lamellar self-assembly structures. Once the (liquid crystal) aggregates are formed, the silica precursors are added to the suspension, the sol-gel reactions occurs and a mesoporous silica material is produced. Finally, the surfactant is removed by chemical or thermal degradation [29] ( ).
Open in a separate windowA definite breakthrough in drug delivery was the use of mesoporous silica NPs to host drugs/therapeutic-molecules/markers. A correct selection of the mesoporous design depends on the molecule to be hosted, and is the first criterion used. The most used mesoporous silica NPs in drug or bioencapsulation are MCM-41 and SBA-15. The synthesis of MCM-41 (from the Mobil Composition of Matter series) involves liquid crystal templating commonly cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) that lead to a 2D hexagonal pore channel array with 3.6 nm in size. The diameters of MCM-41 NPs can be controlled in a size range from 25 nm to 100–150 nm. The SBA-15 (Santa Barbara type) is also largely used as biocarrier. This type of mesoporous silica material is prepared by cooperative self-assembly with a pluronic P123 (a non-ionic block co-polymer). The channels adopt also a 2D hexagonal packing with a diameter varying from 6 to 10 nm depending on the synthesis conditions.
The release of the drug from the host mesoporous NP is definitely the big challenge. This may occur through diffusion all through the pore channels (in passive drug delivery) or released under specific stimuli as pH, temperature, ultra-sons or light (in stimuli-responsive systems). Although an impressive variety of mesoporous NPs have design, synthesized and (in vitro and in vivo) tested no products have reached the market so far.
Want more information on modified silica sol? Feel free to contact us.