Casting -- one of the oldest known manufacturing techniques -- is a process in which liquid material (e.g. molten metal) is poured into a mold cavity and hardened. After removing the piece from the mold, various finishing treatments can be applied to create a dazzling final product. This process is used primarily to manufacture complex solid and hollow designs for a wide range of industries, from aerospace and automotive to electronics.
For more information, please visit our website.
Although casting is a tried-and-true relic of the manufacturing world, technological advances have created specialized casting varieties appropriate for different applications. Below we'll take a look at investment casting and die casting advantages and disadvantages so you'll be armed with the necessary information to choose which process is best suited for your upcoming metal project.
IC Process | Niagara IC
How Investment Casting Works
Investment casting (also called "lost wax" or "precision" casting) is a manufacturing process in which a wax pattern is created, gated onto a sprue and repeatedly dipped into a liquid ceramic slurry. Once the ceramic material hardens, its internal geometry takes the shape of the casting. The wax is melted out, and molten metal is poured into the cavity where the wax pattern was. The metal solidifies within the ceramic mold, and then the metal casting is broken out (source).
This infographic by Pennsylvania Precision Cast Parts breaks it down in a digestible way. (Click the image to view larger.)
How Die Casting Works
Die casting is a manufacturing process for producing metal parts by forcing molten metal under high pressure into a die cavity. These die or mold cavities are typically created with hardened tool steel that has been previously machined to the net shape of the die cast parts (source).
Here's an infographic by ESP International that shows each step of the high-pressure DC process. Click the image to view larger.
Which Process is Right for My Project?
Rather than pit these two processes against one another, we'll simply run through some key considerations when it comes to settling on a casting process. Keep in mind that there isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. Each product, project and company are different. Review the 7 considerations below to decide whether investment casting (IC) or die casting (DC) fits the bill.
1. Design Complexity
How complex is your design geometry? This will play a major part in selecting the right process. IC offers great design flexibility since you can cast intricate shapes and easily incorporate design features, such as logos and other information, into the component. You can also achieve precise dimensional results, complex geometries and thin-walled parts. DC offers good dimensional results but cannot produce the level of intricacy that IC can.
2. Material Selection
A wide range of alloys (including both ferrous and non-ferrous metals) can be used in IC, offering greater material options than DC. This allows for casting alloys that might be challenging to machine. Most DC are made from non-ferrous metals like zinc, copper, aluminium, magnesium, lead, pewter and tin-based alloys.
3. Annual Usage
One of the biggest misconceptions about IC is that it only makes sense for large order quantities. While you can opt for IC for smaller production runs, the final call usually comes down to tooling costs. Start by deciding your desired payback period for the tool and crunch some numbers to see if IC is actually the best option. DC is ideal for large production runs and high-volume projects since it produces excellent consistency and repeatability but comes with a higher tooling price tag.
Yitai contains other products and information you need, so please check it out.
4. Part Size
IC can accommodate parts from an ounce up to about 200 pounds. There is some limitation to the size of parts that can be investment cast simply because the wax pattern must be securely gated to a sprue for repeated dipping in the ceramic slurry. DC also comes with its own size limitations, but they tend to be less restrictive than IC; however, the larger the part, the larger the tool, the larger the tooling cost.
5. Tolerance
IC can really deliver on tight tolerances, while DC produces good tolerances. As a general rule, the smaller the casting, the greater the dimensional accuracy. Very large investment castings might lose some dimensional accuracy, so DC could be a better option for large-scale pieces.
6. Cost
IC ordinarily costs more than DC because it's a highly manual process that produces superior dimensionality and excellent surface finishes. But the final cost truly comes down to tooling. IC can be designed for minimal machining, reducing both time and cost. DC comes with higher tooling costs and typically requires at least some secondary machining to properly finish the product. For these reasons, DC is most cost-efficient for high-volume runs.
7. Finish Requirements
The surface finish of IC is superior to other casting methods, reducing the need for excessive secondary machining. A 125 micro finish is standard, and better finishes can be achieved with the help of other finishing techniques like polishing or blasting. While DC produces good surface finish, more machining is usually needed to get the product to its final state.
Final Thoughts
Hopefully this information will assist you in choosing the right casting process for your upcoming metal project. If you're still unsure which direction to go, turn to your contract manufacturer for guidance. Here's a quick recap for your reference:
Investment Casting
- Excellent precision, ideal for complex geometries
- Can meet tight tolerance requirements
- Superior surface finish, little additional machining required
- Higher total cost than other casting processes
- Lower tooling costs
- Suitable for both ferrous and non-ferrous metals
- Some product size restrictions
Die Casting
- Produces parts with good dimensional tolerance
- Little secondary machining required
- Ideal for large production runs and high-volume projects
- Excellent for producing consistent, repeatable parts
- High tooling costs
Suggested Reading:
In that last shot you can see the detail that is captured by this method (you can see fingerprints that I had left in the wax being transfered to the aluminum). That "finger" is about 1/2" around. Also you can see the multiple layers of ceramic. It takes MANY layers with progressively larger and larger aggregate to build up the surface. It can't be done in one big layer (at least not without a large investment).
This is obviously the highest labor/lowest invest way to do it. If you are interested I may be able to get information on the ceramic material and where to buy it. As I recall we had to order about $500 to get a minimum order, and it would be enough to do many patterns. I believe you can also break up and reuse the ceramic that was fired as the aggregate for new models - you then just need to purchase more of the slurry.
This process took us several weeks to do but it was done at our convenience. The pattern making was done one night per week, and once the coating started someone came in every day for a week. The pour was all done on one day (bronze and aluminum). If you want to see more pix, they are available here (I did a control arm in an expoxy/sand form as well):
Metal Casting | mcphill | Fotki.com, photo and video sharing made easy.
The coating is a VERY special mix. It used to take weeks to do because you had to wait for the moisture to evaporate between every layer (or invest in a LOT of equipment). In the last few years they have come up with a formulation that you can do two coats per day. We used this in a casting class at the Indianapolis Museum of Art. After putting on 10+ coats over a week (over wax patterns), we used a blow torch (weed killer) to melt out the wax from each of the forms. Next the patterns had to be fired in a VERY high temperature oven (this one is used for Roku pottery) to completely burn off any impurities and to fire the ceramic. If you don't take this step, you will fracture the coating. Soon after the firing (as soon as possible, so it is still hot) you can pour the aluminum. If the coating is thick enough it does not need to be supported, but you would be better off to surround it in sand to ensure you don't get a blowout. Here are a series of pictures making parts at the arts center:In that last shot you can see the detail that is captured by this method (you can see fingerprints that I had left in the wax being transfered to the aluminum). That "finger" is about 1/2" around. Also you can see the multiple layers of ceramic. It takes MANY layers with progressively larger and larger aggregate to build up the surface. It can't be done in one big layer (at least not without a large investment).This is obviously the highest labor/lowest invest way to do it. If you are interested I may be able to get information on the ceramic material and where to buy it. As I recall we had to order about $500 to get a minimum order, and it would be enough to do many patterns. I believe you can also break up and reuse the ceramic that was fired as the aggregate for new models - you then just need to purchase more of the slurry.This process took us several weeks to do but it was done at our convenience. The pattern making was done one night per week, and once the coating started someone came in every day for a week. The pour was all done on one day (bronze and aluminum). If you want to see more pix, they are available here (I did a control arm in an expoxy/sand form as well):